I'm in agreement that a jeweler who doesn't open up the case to take pictures of the inside of the watch either doesn't know his market, or is hiding something. I looked at a blow up of the back of the watch and saw this:
I think the caseback is correct for this watch after looking at a few other examples online. In the lower left and upper right there are small Swiss hallmarks. My opinion is that it is solid gold. The only question is 14K or 18K. Also, it looks a little rough around the inside of the lugs. This is generally an indication that the watch spent years on a gold bracelet, which was probably only recently scrapped. A shame, but that is the way of the world right now.
The case doesn't look like it was polished too harshly as the antiquing is still present on the logo. That's the dark highlighting in the middle, which was there when the watch was new.
In a gold capped watch, the back would be mostly steel with just a little bit of gold wrapped around the lugs. Omega did not make this model in gold plate or filled.
In looking at the face of the watch, I do have questions about the hands. Here is a picture of the subject watch:
Here is a picture of a similar watch...had look awhile to find one without tritium on the hands:
The hands on the second watch are a bit more pointed. You can see this watch and more on the Constellation Collectors Blog here:
http://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.com/2007/07/omega-seamaster-golden-chronometres.html
Couple the factors above with a price that seems a bit high for this watch, and I'd take a pass.
Hope this helps,
gatorcpa
Click to expand...