What is wrong with this 145.022?

Posts
362
Likes
594
I found this watch on the Bay.
But what is wrong with it?

Kind regards

 
Posts
908
Likes
2,491
So what do you want to know?
There can be no answers without questions.
What are your own observations?
 
Posts
1,761
Likes
5,528
it has all the box and papers. so the only thing possibly wrong with it on ebay would be the price.馃榿
 
Posts
242
Likes
2,453
I can鈥檛 find that anything is obvious wrong. Case is polished which I personally don鈥檛 like since it doesn鈥檛 match the overall condition of the watch
 
Posts
362
Likes
594
Look at the bezel, it is not centered and it is a "220"...
 
Posts
10,451
Likes
16,345
Well it appears to be a late 1970s/early 80s Speedy with not especially nice hand patina. If it is claimed to be earlier than yes there is something wrong.
 
Posts
10,451
Likes
16,345
Re the 220, That鈥檚 a well known feature from some 1970 production. The dial isn鈥檛 right for a 220 as it has no step and has the long S. One or other was likely changed. What year is on the papers? You haven鈥檛 given us much.
Edited:
 
Posts
362
Likes
594
The "220" bezel insert was only used, as far as I could find out, for a short period of time on the ref. 145.022-69 from October to December, last quarter 1970.
 
Posts
10,451
Likes
16,345
The "220" bezel insert was only used, as far as I could find out, for a short period of time on the ref. 145.022-69 from October to December, last quarter 1970.
See above. So what鈥檚 your question? You haven鈥檛 given us anything to go on but presumably have a seller description.
 
Posts
362
Likes
594
The question was "What is wrong with this 145.022?".
Clearly a "220" bezel has nothing to do on a watch that seems to be a 145.022-76, being the insert only used for a very short period of time at the end of 1970. Furthermore the "60" is not exactly centered...
It could also be a 145.022-69 with the correct serial number with a later dial, but in this case also the case back and the band would be wrong.
 
Posts
10,451
Likes
16,345
Why a 76 and not a 78?

Ah so it was a test? Great but not exactly fair since you had the caseback and papers to go on!

I agree from what you say it鈥檚 a late 70s watch with a swapped 220 bezel.
 
Posts
362
Likes
594
The dial with the specifications of the one on the watch were mounted from 1976 on (source MWO).
 
Posts
10,451
Likes
16,345
The dial with the specifications of the one on the watch were mounted from 1976 on (source MWO).
Yep but my question is why a -76 specifically? That dial was in use from 1977 to 1990 and used on the -76, -78, 145.022, 145.0022.

If you are going to be pedantic be right!
 
Posts
1,861
Likes
5,424
As far as I know it could be a 68 transitional with the wrong dial and the wrong bezel !
 
Posts
362
Likes
594
I found the beginning of the serial number 45.xxx.xxx
 
Posts
10,451
Likes
16,345
I found the beginning of the serial number 45.xxx.xxx
So a -78 or later model then in fact based on the serial...
 
Posts
362
Likes
594
Yep but my question is why a -76 specifically? That dial was in use from 1977 to 1990 and used on the -76, -78, 145.022, 145.0022.

If you are going to be pedantic be right!

I meant at least a 145.022-76.
 
Posts
13,210
Likes
22,974
Is this a query or a little game/test? Starting to look like a strange thread.
 
Posts
248
Likes
184
Yeah, I can't tell if it's just that the photos could be better of if the patina is the unattractive kind