So what do you want to know? There can be no answers without questions. What are your own observations?
I can’t find that anything is obvious wrong. Case is polished which I personally don’t like since it doesn’t match the overall condition of the watch
Well it appears to be a late 1970s/early 80s Speedy with not especially nice hand patina. If it is claimed to be earlier than yes there is something wrong.
Re the 220, That’s a well known feature from some 1970 production. The dial isn’t right for a 220 as it has no step and has the long S. One or other was likely changed. What year is on the papers? You haven’t given us much.
The "220" bezel insert was only used, as far as I could find out, for a short period of time on the ref. 145.022-69 from October to December, last quarter 1970.
See above. So what’s your question? You haven’t given us anything to go on but presumably have a seller description.
The question was "What is wrong with this 145.022?". Clearly a "220" bezel has nothing to do on a watch that seems to be a 145.022-76, being the insert only used for a very short period of time at the end of 1970. Furthermore the "60" is not exactly centered... It could also be a 145.022-69 with the correct serial number with a later dial, but in this case also the case back and the band would be wrong.
Why a 76 and not a 78? Ah so it was a test? Great but not exactly fair since you had the caseback and papers to go on! I agree from what you say it’s a late 70s watch with a swapped 220 bezel.
Yep but my question is why a -76 specifically? That dial was in use from 1977 to 1990 and used on the -76, -78, 145.022, 145.0022. If you are going to be pedantic be right!
Last time I see these not centered bezels more often. (https://omegaforums.net/threads/1977-omega-speedmaster-professional-ref-145-022-76.101032/)
Yeah, I can't tell if it's just that the photos could be better of if the patina is the unattractive kind