Hi,
What do you think about this one? It is located close to me in a vintage watch shop, the seller states that it has an original dial, but I have my concerns.
I also asked for advice in another topic, and got a positive and a negative feedback about it, so I don't feel closer to the solution.


Thank you in advance.
heccsat

 

Do you have any more pics? Caseback, inside caseback, movement, etc?
The dial itself looks original to me....

 

Unfortunately only this one. I have not seen it yet in person. One concern which I've been told is"I've never seen a dial with multiple fonts for the same numbers (as far as the 3s and 6s and the "1000" are concerned)..."

 

The sub-dials look wrong to me. Shouldn't the numbers be radial?

Below is a picture of a watch with a very similar dial that I have since sold that I know had a genuine dial (there had been some debate and the watchmaker helped verify that it was all original).

 

Well we just learned again not to judge a book by its cover did we not? Take pics of case back inside caseback and movement.

 

Yes that’s a warning sign.

 

Hard to say definitively. Radial sub dials predominate but there are a few. Need more pics

 

Learn something new every day.

 

The second watch in the sala comment is a redial. I think the subdial in the OP watch is a give away it is a redial

 

I had heard that some of the Sala b&w pics were redials and the bezel on the A Carrelli is wrong but are there also redial problems with the color plates?