What do you think about this Omega 2503-14?

Posts
5
Likes
0
Hi to everyone, I would like to know what do you think about this watch I'm considering to purchase.
I have doubts about the dial: indexes and writings look too good to me for its age, but actually they look very well repainted, if this is the case. Moreover I don't know if the yellowish of the dial is a patina or something else, it looks very uniform to me.
Finally, the case looks good to me, maybe a little polished but not too much (?).

Thank you for your help!
 
Posts
16,663
Likes
47,130
Looks good to me. If the price is right, I'd buy it. Around 1953. Diameter?

This is good enough for me to buy it ^

Price helps us help you…. Could be a good buy at one price and a bad buy at another price.
 
Posts
16,135
Likes
34,087
I'd buy it if the price was right, but I suspect it will be above my financial limit this month.
Case is a bit soft, though not too bad. Dial looks good, not all dials from this era had "perfect" printing.
 
Posts
16,663
Likes
47,130
Second look….is the 1 in 12 a bit different (been changed as it looks longer and thicker)
 
Posts
16,135
Likes
34,087
Second look….is the 1 in 12 a bit different (been changed as it looks longer and thicker)
Good pickup Andy. I missed it, definitely looks like a replacement index.
 
Posts
1,328
Likes
5,080
Someone put an index from another dial instead of the 1. Good eye @STANDY
Otherwise, a nice example.
 
Posts
647
Likes
1,494
Very nice...and a very natural patina. I love how the Omegas from this era lay flat on the wrist...even the 38mm ones. Just be careful of water resistance...or lack of it. When I wear mine, I take it off when doing anything around a sink or where they'll be steam and moisture.
 
Posts
631
Likes
785
Is the misalignment of the minute markers and the indices (most notably at 9, but also 3, 7, and 8) not a problem?
I have a watch with a similar dial that has a similar misalignment on a few indices that I chalked up to either a rotated index or a quality control issue. Was this common in this era?
Edited:
 
Posts
5
Likes
0
Thanks to everyone for your help, I really appreciated!
Looks good to me. If the price is right, I'd buy it. Around 1953. Diameter?
It's a 36mm

This is good enough for me to buy it ^

Price helps us help you…. Could be a good buy at one price and a bad buy at another price.
Price is around 850€/910$... I have seen prices that double that number for watches in this conditions, hence I'm here asking for your help
 
Posts
305
Likes
1,578
This watch has been sold on ebay, 3 days ago (at least exact the same fotos). Winning bid: 700 GBP.
Is it you, who has been succesful?
 
Posts
5
Likes
0
UWG UWG
This watch has been sold on ebay, 3 days ago (at least exact the same fotos). Winning bid: 700 GBP.
Is it you, who has been succesful?
Yep, it's me... I have to receive it yet and I can return it if I'm not satisfied.
 
Posts
305
Likes
1,578
I understand. Yesterday you considered to buy, but you already bought.
Enjoy your new watch.
 
Posts
5
Likes
0
UWG UWG
I understand. Yesterday you considered to buy, but you already bought.
Enjoy your new watch.
Yes, actually I've already bought the watch but, since I can return it without any major expense, to me it's still a "considering to buy"...
I just wanted to secure it because they are hard to find in such nice conditions.

Thank you anyway!
 
Posts
5
Likes
0
Is the misalignment of the minute markers and the indices (most notably at 9, but also 3, 7, and 8) not a problem?
I have a watch with a similar dial that has a similar misalignment on a few indices that I chalked up to either a rotated index or a quality control issue. Was this common in this era?
I noticed it too in the one I posted, but I found the same "defect" also in other watches of the same age for sale around websites, so I think it is a production problem.
For context I owned a 2018 Tudor Pelagos that had much worse indexes misalignement, but obviously it was crafted with much more modern machinery, so to me it is not a surprise anymore.