What do you think about this cal 381?

Posts
178
Likes
166
Tried to post the photo with no luck so here’s the link to the pic.

https://imgur.com/gallery/cSxcusj

Is it just bad watchmaking? Seems like a lot of oxidation, dirt, and even a partial fingerprint. I’m guessing a competent watchmaker could clear this up. What do you think?

Chris
Edited:
 
Posts
13,574
Likes
18,891


Here is your picture. Not sure whether this is worth salvaging. Need to see rest of the watch.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
178
Likes
166
Thanks. It’s an otherwise very nice rose gold 3944.



Here is your picture. Not sure whether this is worth salvaging. Need to see rest of the watch.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
24,762
Likes
55,003
Please post photos to the forum if you'd like feedback.
 
Posts
178
Likes
166
Please post photos to the forum if you'd like feedback.
i’m working on it. I don’t really have a photo hosting account anymore. I thought imagur would work, but it didn’t.
 
Posts
1,704
Likes
7,260
i’m working on it. I don’t really have a photo hosting account anymore. I thought imagur would work, but it didn’t.
You upload the pictures directly to this forum. Photo hosting is unnecessary and we risk photos disappearing if/when the hosting companies fold.
 
Posts
178
Likes
166
silly me. I should’ve paid more attention I imagine. Thank you. Here are a couple more shots of the watch.
You upload the pictures directly to this forum. Photo hosting is unnecessary and we risk photos disappearing if/when the hosting companies fold.
 
Posts
1,704
Likes
7,260
Stunning. Of course worth salvaging.
 
Posts
178
Likes
166
Stunning. Of course worth salvaging.
I agree. Was just wondering what the consensus would be on cleaning up the movement. I was shocked to see there was actually a partial fingerprint on it.
 
Posts
1,704
Likes
7,260
I agree. Was just wondering what the consensus would be on cleaning up the movement. I was shocked to see there was actually a partial fingerprint on it.
It just needs a service. As long as the fingerprints are not on the dial face, I wouldn't bother. It shows however that the movement has been in the hands of an amateur.
 
Posts
178
Likes
166
It just needs a service. As long as the fingerprints are not on the dial face, I wouldn't bother. It shows however that the movement has been in the hands of an amateur.
I agree. Frankly, I was shocked that the screwheads appear to be in perfect condition. Normally amateurs mangle those pretty good as well.
 
Posts
13,488
Likes
31,796
It shows however that the movement has been in the hands of an amateur.

Perhaps the photographer?
 
Posts
13,574
Likes
18,891
Probably worth the price. These are rare birds and that dial looks pretty good.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
178
Likes
166
And it came with the original dial! (Which isn’t actually bad at all.)
 
Posts
6,675
Likes
11,615
Saw this but I had some doubts about the vintage originality of both dials.
 
Posts
178
Likes
166
Saw this but I had some doubts about the vintage originality of both dials.
Hmm. Yes, you may be right. I looked at the “original” on a big screen and it appears to be a redial as well. Oh well.