Forums Latest Auctions Members
  1. shah@123

    shah@123 Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    37
    Likes
    11
    Hi please find the below watch - From my research it is cal 342 ST 135 0007 serial number.

    I am not able to find the exact watch dial from my research.

    Couple of questions

    1. Is the watch the real deal and if so how do you rate the condition? are there issues like dial redone etc that you see
    2. Is this good watch to be the first one being soo old like the 1940s
     
    s-l1600 (1).jpg s-l1600 (2).jpg s-l1600 (3).jpg s-l1600 (4).jpg s-l1600 (5).jpg s-l1600 (6).jpg s-l1600 (7).jpg s-l1600 (8).jpg s-l1600 (9).jpg s-l1600.jpg
  2. 03Hemi

    03Hemi Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    462
    Likes
    511
    Nice.
     
  3. Syrte

    Syrte Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    4,962
    Likes
    12,531
    The dial’s refinished. So not a good watch if you’re looking for a collectable one.
     
    chronos and UncleBuck like this.
  4. UncleBuck

    UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    2,807
    Likes
    5,601
    Redial with rotor replaced and wrong crown......
    Good parts watch with intrinsic value but I would test the gold content.
    I feel it's a genuine case, just a watch that has had some work.

    r0_0_800_600_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
     
    89-0 and phcollard like this.
  5. UncleBuck

    UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    2,807
    Likes
    5,601
    Don't mean to be sexist but I couldn't get Siegfried and Roy to load.
     
    janice&fred, Fritz and JimInOz like this.
  6. Dan S

    Dan S Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    7,131
    Likes
    16,274
    Yes, the dial has been repainted and the movement appears to have a "rotor" replaced from a different movement. The dial is probably the bigger issue for the OP. If the OP wants a gold Omega at a good price, the 9k Dennison-cased watches can be a good value.
     
    chronos likes this.
  7. shah@123

    shah@123 Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    37
    Likes
    11
    Thanks for your input - this helped me decide this aint the watch for me
     
    janice&fred, 89-0 and Walrus like this.
  8. Gav1967

    Gav1967 Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    519
    Likes
    1,026
    I thikn that's a wise decision :thumbsup:
     
    Benbradstock and chronos like this.
  9. efauser

    efauser I ♥ karma!!! Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    7,850
    Likes
    12,801
    Roy said the same about Siegfried. ::rimshot::
     
  10. UncleBuck

    UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    2,807
    Likes
    5,601
    Funnier than all get out.. but oh, so wrong!
    I'm ashamed that I like this so much.
     
  11. UncleBuck

    UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    2,807
    Likes
    5,601
    It could actually be a great parts watch in the right circumstances.
     
  12. OMEGuy

    OMEGuy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    2,093
    Likes
    2,700
    DaveK likes this.
  13. X350 XJR

    X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    9,203
    Likes
    19,055
    Aside from the movement likely being a 28.10 and not a 342, it's an honest although subjective (aren't they all) description.

    Screen Shot 2020-02-14 at 6.14.16 PM.png
     
  14. shah@123

    shah@123 Feb 15, 2020

    Posts
    37
    Likes
    11
  15. DManzaluni

    DManzaluni Feb 15, 2020

    Posts
    298
    Likes
    112
    Looks like a slightly later version of the watch my father bought from Evans Jewelers in Leeds in 1947. Omega later bastardised it with a new dial and hands when it went in for a service! (I am still looking to buy the original dial with arabic numerals)

    The bidding looks heavily shilled, though I got a good price for a cushion form trench Omega with a Dennison case last week without needing to shill anything!