Forums Latest Members
  1. shah@123 Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    36
    Likes
    11
    Hi please find the below watch - From my research it is cal 342 ST 135 0007 serial number.

    I am not able to find the exact watch dial from my research.

    Couple of questions

    1. Is the watch the real deal and if so how do you rate the condition? are there issues like dial redone etc that you see
    2. Is this good watch to be the first one being soo old like the 1940s
     
    s-l1600 (1).jpg s-l1600 (2).jpg s-l1600 (3).jpg s-l1600 (4).jpg s-l1600 (5).jpg s-l1600 (6).jpg s-l1600 (7).jpg s-l1600 (8).jpg s-l1600 (9).jpg s-l1600.jpg
  2. 03Hemi Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    453
    Likes
    521
    Nice.
     
  3. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    7,422
    Likes
    20,883
    The dial’s refinished. So not a good watch if you’re looking for a collectable one.
     
    chronos and UncleBuck like this.
  4. UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    3,420
    Likes
    7,745
    Redial with rotor replaced and wrong crown......
    Good parts watch with intrinsic value but I would test the gold content.
    I feel it's a genuine case, just a watch that has had some work.

    r0_0_800_600_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
     
    89-0 and phcollard like this.
  5. UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    3,420
    Likes
    7,745
    Don't mean to be sexist but I couldn't get Siegfried and Roy to load.
     
    janice&fred, Fritz and JimInOz like this.
  6. Dan S Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    18,776
    Likes
    43,185
    Yes, the dial has been repainted and the movement appears to have a "rotor" replaced from a different movement. The dial is probably the bigger issue for the OP. If the OP wants a gold Omega at a good price, the 9k Dennison-cased watches can be a good value.
     
    chronos likes this.
  7. shah@123 Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    36
    Likes
    11
    Thanks for your input - this helped me decide this aint the watch for me
     
    janice&fred, 89-0 and Walrus like this.
  8. Gav1967 Tend not to fret too much Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    1,398
    Likes
    2,971
    I thikn that's a wise decision :thumbsup:
     
    Benbradstock and chronos like this.
  9. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    Roy said the same about Siegfried. ::rimshot::
     
  10. UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    3,420
    Likes
    7,745
    Funnier than all get out.. but oh, so wrong!
    I'm ashamed that I like this so much.
     
  11. UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    3,420
    Likes
    7,745
    It could actually be a great parts watch in the right circumstances.
     
  12. OMEGuy Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    DaveK likes this.
  13. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Feb 14, 2020

    Posts
    12,586
    Likes
    29,836
    Aside from the movement likely being a 28.10 and not a 342, it's an honest although subjective (aren't they all) description.

    Screen Shot 2020-02-14 at 6.14.16 PM.png
     
  14. shah@123 Feb 15, 2020

    Posts
    36
    Likes
    11
    Yes it was on ebay but I did not bid it.
     
  15. DManzaluni Feb 15, 2020

    Posts
    386
    Likes
    165
    Looks like a slightly later version of the watch my father bought from Evans Jewelers in Leeds in 1947. Omega later bastardised it with a new dial and hands when it went in for a service! (I am still looking to buy the original dial with arabic numerals)

    The bidding looks heavily shilled, though I got a good price for a cushion form trench Omega with a Dennison case last week without needing to shill anything!