Just want to get input. I have a 145.022-69 that is all original but there is a little paint missing from the DON bezel and a little lume/paint missing from dial/hands. Someone told me recently they felt it was a below average example. Are there a lot of pristine Speedys from 1969 out there that I’m unaware of? Picture for reference:

 

Need more pictures but it certainly isn't below average. Was the person who told you this attempting to buy it by any chance?

 

They were so I guess I shouldn’t have taken it personally, but it is my personal watch so.....

 

I have no idea how to define "average". The OP watch is appealing, but probably doesn't quite reach the GOOD category as defined on speedmaster101.com.

 

I like your Speedmaster. Apart from one area that is scratched your DON bezel looks in good condition. I think the most important thing is that it appears to be a watch that has not been messed about with.

 

Agreed. It's not quite 'good', but certainly isn't below average. I'd say it's average+.

 

Thanks all. Speedy101’s good seems to be the most vague of all it's descriptive categories. Would you guys consider loss of tritium dial damage?

 

Well, it diminishes the value of the watch whether we call it damage or not.

 

When something that was originally there has fallen off then it can only be considered as damage!

 

The borderline between damage and patina tends to vary depending if someone is a seller or a buyer

 

Well if a half way decent watchmaker touched up that hour hand, you watch would certainly be in the good category imo.

 

I think I'd prefer to keep it original than risk an iffy paint job. Thanks for all the input though.

 

What about the hair that was on my head but is not longer there?

 

I like your watch, if you have ever plans to sell it, you may send me a PM. I think the quality of the bezel is - after 50 years - more than average.