TDBK
·in this situation, should the watch be listed on the Stolen Watch databases?
And, if it turns up at a later time, shouldn't the Buyer have first right to buy it at the prior eBay deal agreed-to price?
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
in this situation, should the watch be listed on the Stolen Watch databases?
And, if it turns up at a later time, shouldn't the Buyer have first right to buy it at the prior eBay deal agreed-to price?
So does the authenticator 'expert' pay any price or does he just carry on until he sees the next watch he likes?
So does the authenticator 'expert' pay any price or does he just carry on until he sees the next watch he likes?
eBay is out a few grand on this watch so presumably they'll be managing that risk and spend.
I hesitate to lean in here, but I can totally see why eBay put this program into place: fakes for modern luxury watches are getting so good that "caveat emptor" wasn't cutting it anymore; it was quickly getting to a point where nobody would be willing to buy such a watch on eBay because they couldn't be sure they'd get the real thing, and sellers who are selling authentic watches wouldn't be able to get fair value (due to the market uncertainty) and might have to deal with buyers disputing the sale, or other problems.
While the program is obviously a giant pain in the ass to operate and has a huge set of logistics challenges (which have been discussed here at length), it's not obvious to me what else eBay could have done to preserve their role as a market provider for these kinds of watches.
The program isn't designed for collectors who know how to "buy the seller" and who are trading in esoteric vintage watches; it is to keep random Schmoes from getting ripped off when they try to buy a Rolex, and eBay losing the whole watch resale market to other channels (Chrono24, physical dealers). (Not to mention placating brands who were pissed about eBay as a facilitator of such frauds and the purchase of fakes.)
A portion of the collector market has gotten swept up in the authentication program, but the collector market is small potatoes to eBay when compared to the trade in commonly-faked luxury watches bought by less-sophisticated consumers.
eBay is out a few grand on this watch so presumably they'll be managing that risk and spend.
I hesitate to lean in here, but I can totally see why eBay put this program into place: fakes for modern luxury watches are getting so good that "caveat emptor" wasn't cutting it anymore; it was quickly getting to a point where nobody would be willing to buy such a watch on eBay because they couldn't be sure they'd get the real thing, and sellers who are selling authentic watches wouldn't be able to get fair value (due to the market uncertainty) and might have to deal with buyers disputing the sale, or other problems.
While the program is obviously a giant pain in the ass to operate and has a huge set of logistics challenges (which have been discussed here at length), it's not obvious to me what else eBay could have done to preserve their role as a market provider for these kinds of watches.
The program isn't designed for collectors who know how to "buy the seller" and who are trading in esoteric vintage watches; it is to keep random Schmoes from getting ripped off when they try to buy a Rolex, and eBay losing the whole watch resale market to other channels (Chrono24, physical dealers). (Not to mention placating brands who were pissed about eBay as a facilitator of such frauds and the purchase of fakes.)
A portion of the collector market has gotten swept up in the authentication program, but the collector market is small potatoes to eBay when compared to the trade in commonly-faked luxury watches bought by less-sophisticated consumers.
Understandable but the authentication program should be optional for collectors who are confident about their purchase with the understanding they hold ebay legally harmless in case a question of authenticity arises. Making authentication mandatory leaves room for potential foul play by the authenticator and logistic mishaps.
Fine, I’ll send it back...
Sorry for the question: what is a "third-party Authenticator"?
You nasty, just nasty 😀
Two pages and no Pam photo. Someone has to do something...