Forums Latest Members

Was Speedmaster reference 2998-1 manufactured beginning in 1958?

  1. dscoogs Mar 18, 2016

    Posts
    647
    Likes
    4,185
    Dear OF - I started looking into vintage Speedmaster (perhaps I shouldn't) and ran across this from John Goldberger's Omega Sportwatches: 2998-1 built in 1958 w/ broad arrow hands, sn 1599xxx .... From reading MWO, Speedmaster101 and googling other sources I have always thought that 2998-1 was built starting in 1959.

    Have you seen any other reference to 1958 2998-1s? Thanks!

    1958 2998-1.JPG
     
  2. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Mar 18, 2016

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,016
    Well I feel a little remiss i never noticed that before in the book.

    The only thing 2998-1 is the case back. While 2998-1's also had the short subdial indices, and the Base1000 bezel, none that I have seen have the broad arrow hands, and none have the 1599xxxx serial, which is also the range I am most comfortable seeing in a 2915-1.

    I suspect this is a 2915 with a replaced back.

    As ever I remain open to evidence based suggestions otherwise, but I don't believe this watch left the factory like this.

    The theory that omega threw whatever parts they had to hand to make a watch does not have firm evidence to support it. However much I like the idea, I just don't believe a Swiss Manufacturing company would do it. Well not this one.
     
    sky21, red crowned and gemini4 like this.
  3. speedy4ever Moonwatch Only Author Mar 19, 2016

    Posts
    639
    Likes
    782
    A 2998-1 in 15.99x.xxx and broad arrow...:D
     
  4. speedy4ever Moonwatch Only Author Mar 19, 2016

    Posts
    639
    Likes
    782
    Furthermore with the A1 dial...
     
  5. flyingout Mar 20, 2016

    Posts
    693
    Likes
    700
    BTW, he's got specific delivery dates and destinations for the early Speedies in that book (as does @speedy4ever in MWO though not quite as precise). That information would be interesting for those of us, at least for me, with watches that don't have extracts available. I assume that Omega was the source.
     
  6. speedy4ever Moonwatch Only Author Mar 20, 2016

    Posts
    639
    Likes
    782
    Sure he had dates and destination, but was not a proof that it was a 2998-1
     
  7. flyingout Mar 20, 2016

    Posts
    693
    Likes
    700
    No disagreement. I was just trying to flesh out the additional information Omega appears to have on these under-documented examples.