Vintage Watches are great, but let’s see some Vintage Cameras

Posts
348
Likes
344
On the topic of vintage camera gear. Whenever I am able, I prefer the use of manual focusing over auto focus, and this has carried over into my adoption of mirrorless photography. I was thinking, if I could only carry one lens in my kit, what would it be. The answer was fairly easy, the 55mm f2.8ai-s Micro Nikkor, introduced in 1979. It will attach to just about anything with an F-mount, film or digital, and can be adapted to any mirrorless camera I am aware of with an inexpensive adapter. Why not a zoom? Well, being somewhat old school, I consider my feet the best zoom. But the better reason is that very few lenses ever made will do what the 55/2.8 will do…capture without spherical distortion through the entire focus range. Most lenses have a single focusing helicoid. This Micro-Nikkor has a helicoid in the front housing optical elements, and a second in the rear that contains the remaining floating optical elements. These helicoids move away from each other, and towards each other simultaneously as the focus is racked out or in. In typical lenses the front optical elements move away or toward the rear elements, which remain static. Regardless of the focal distance, there is neither “barrel” or “pincushion” distortion. Additional features such as Close Range Correction, and Nikon Integrated Coatings are helpful, but the magic of this macro lens is the Dual Helical Focus. Not to mention that this lens is considered one of the sharpest ever by Nikon, up there with the 105mm f2.5ai-s Nikkor. This lens is used not only in general and macro photography, but is considered a “reference” lens and employed in numerous scientific and reproduction categories like printed circuits, print copy, and art work.

None of this is news to old-timey film shooters, but there is probably a younger photographer or two that will find this information useful. For those landscape photographers, particularly if involved in HDR, this lens has a smallest aperture of f32. It certainly deserves a nod in any discussion of vintage camera gear. What might come as a surprise in this age of sophisticated auto focus with multi-axis motion stabilization is that Nikon will still make this lens for you, identical to the original, on special order.

The fifties through the eighties was an exceptional time of development for all metal and glass 35mm film lenses. During this period optical engineer Ellis Betensky was collaborating with Perkin-Elmer and NASA to refine optical designs through the use of their computers. The Vivitar Series One line of lenses was a partial result of this joint research, and in many ways elevated all of the consumer photography industry. This was an era before the routine use of plastics in both cameras and lenses, even in internal optical elements. Give vintage glass a try on your digital cameras, you might like it.
 
Posts
2,145
Likes
4,468
Give vintage glass a try on your digital cameras, you might like it.

and don´t forget to RESET and switch off all internal "adjustments" of the processor inside the camera 😀

(greetings from my Summilux 1:1.4 - 50)
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,889
On the topic of vintage camera gear. Whenever I am able, I prefer the use of manual focusing over auto focus, and this has carried over into my adoption of mirrorless photography. I was thinking, if I could only carry one lens in my kit, what would it be. The answer was fairly easy, the 55mm f2.8ai-s Micro Nikkor, introduced in 1979. It will attach to just about anything with an F-mount, film or digital, and can be adapted to any mirrorless camera I am aware of with an inexpensive adapter. Why not a zoom? Well, being somewhat old school, I consider my feet the best zoom. But the better reason is that very few lenses ever made will do what the 55/2.8 will do…capture without spherical distortion through the entire focus range. Most lenses have a single focusing helicoid. This Micro-Nikkor has a helicoid in the front housing optical elements, and a second in the rear that contains the remaining floating optical elements. These helicoids move away from each other, and towards each other simultaneously as the focus is racked out or in. In typical lenses the front optical elements move away or toward the rear elements, which remain static. Regardless of the focal distance, there is neither “barrel” or “pincushion” distortion. Additional features such as Close Range Correction, and Nikon Integrated Coatings are helpful, but the magic of this macro lens is the Dual Helical Focus. Not to mention that this lens is considered one of the sharpest ever by Nikon, up there with the 105mm f2.5ai-s Nikkor. This lens is used not only in general and macro photography, but is considered a “reference” lens and employed in numerous scientific and reproduction categories like printed circuits, print copy, and art work.

None of this is news to old-timey film shooters, but there is probably a younger photographer or two that will find this information useful. For those landscape photographers, particularly if involved in HDR, this lens has a smallest aperture of f32. It certainly deserves a nod in any discussion of vintage camera gear. What might come as a surprise in this age of sophisticated auto focus with multi-axis motion stabilization is that Nikon will still make this lens for you, identical to the original, on special order.

The fifties through the eighties was an exceptional time of development for all metal and glass 35mm film lenses. During this period optical engineer Ellis Betensky was collaborating with Perkin-Elmer and NASA to refine optical designs through the use of their computers. The Vivitar Series One line of lenses was a partial result of this joint research, and in many ways elevated all of the consumer photography industry. This was an era before the routine use of plastics in both cameras and lenses, even in internal optical elements. Give vintage glass a try on your digital cameras, you might like it.

I made the transition to digital professionally in 2012, and have shot Nikon DSLR’s since (D4,D850,D6). I came to love them as very capable tools and Nikon PC lenses worked well for most architectural work (and gave me some manual focus joy). I resisted moving to mirrorless as my exposure was with Sony (we have a couple early Sony adopters in my office) and the UI and handling of those cameras is awful- way too many menus and they feel like a toy.

I migrated to Leica SL (SL2&SL2S) last year and it’s been a revelation. Yes, the EVF takes some getting used to (will always love an SLR), but the Leica EVF is the best in the business currently. Further the SL system is a Swiss Army knife, use it with Sigma or Panasonic glass (both of which are insanely good and offer specialty lenses outside Leica’s current SL offerings like Macro’s and super Tele’s) Canon T/S lenses with a Sigma adapter (tried to use Nikon PC with Novoflex but the Canon lenses are more friendly with the electronics in the SL) Nikon manual focus with adapter and the M adapter allows me to use my M mount lenses including my Voigtlander lenses like the 10mm (which is rectilinear) and 75mm which is an amazing portrait lens.

All 6-bit coded Leica lenses are a plug and play with the SL’s and with the size of the Summilux’s, feel like you have an R5/R6 back in your hands again.
Being able to swap back and forth from SL to M body depending on the work or even using both bodies (since the UI’s are identical) is awesome. I was bored with digital, it was a tool for work, film was where I had my fun. But the SL system brought the fun back to digital.

I forgot that people like pics here
Edited:
 
Posts
2,444
Likes
6,612
I made the transition to digital professionally in 2012, and have shot Nikon DSLR’s since (D4,D850,D6). I came to love them as very capable tools and Nikon PC lenses worked well for most architectural work (and gave me some manual focus joy). I resisted moving to mirrorless as my exposure was with Sony (we have a couple early Sony adopters in my office) and the UI and handling of those cameras is awful- way too many menus and they feel like a toy.

I migrated to Leica SL (SL2&SL2S) last year and it’s been a revelation. Yes, the EVF takes some getting used to (will always love an SLR), but the Leica EVF is the best in the business currently. Further the SL system is a Swiss Army knife, use it with Sigma or Panasonic glass (both of which are insanely good and offer specialty lenses outside Leica’s current SL offerings like Macro’s and super Tele’s) Canon T/S lenses with a Sigma adapter (tried to use Nikon PC with Novoflex but the Canon lenses are more friendly with the electronics in the SL) Nikon manual focus with adapter and the M adapter allows me to use my M mount lenses including my Voigtlander lenses like the 10mm (which is rectilinear) and 75mm which is an amazing portrait lens.

All 6-bit coded Leica lenses are a plug and play with the SL’s and with the size of the Summilux’s, feel like you have an R5/R6 back in your hands again.
Being able to swap back and forth from SL to M body depending on the work or even using both bodies (since the UI’s are identical) is awesome. I was bored with digital, it was a tool for work, film was where I had my fun. But the SL system brought the fun back to digital.

I forgot that people like pics here

People like you put the elves in Wetzlar out of work with choosing lenses by performance and not by name.
Not good, not good. 😉
 
Posts
348
Likes
344
and don´t forget to RESET and switch off all internal "adjustments" of the processor inside the camera 😀

(greetings from my Summilux 1:1.4 - 50)
and don´t forget to RESET and switch off all internal "adjustments" of the processor inside the camera 😀

(greetings from my Summilux 1:1.4 - 50)
Since I am aware that you have an aversion to digital imagery, which is admirable, I am trying to figure out if you are warning me that my sensor is tracking me (grin), or that in reality the sensor is still doing some of the work even if you are shooting in Manual mode? I usually shoot in Aperture Priority in either case, so regardless I am still a cheater to a purist.
I made the transition to digital professionally in 2012, and have shot Nikon DSLR’s since (D4,D850,D6). I came to love them as very capable tools and Nikon PC lenses worked well for most architectural work (and gave me some manual focus joy). I resisted moving to mirrorless as my exposure was with Sony (we have a couple early Sony adopters in my office) and the UI and handling of those cameras is awful- way too many menus and they feel like a toy.

I migrated to Leica SL (SL2&SL2S) last year and it’s been a revelation. Yes, the EVF takes some getting used to (will always love an SLR), but the Leica EVF is the best in the business currently. Further the SL system is a Swiss Army knife, use it with Sigma or Panasonic glass (both of which are insanely good and offer specialty lenses outside Leica’s current SL offerings like Macro’s and super Tele’s) Canon T/S lenses with a Sigma adapter (tried to use Nikon PC with Novoflex but the Canon lenses are more friendly with the electronics in the SL) Nikon manual focus with adapter and the M adapter allows me to use my M mount lenses including my Voigtlander lenses like the 10mm (which is rectilinear) and 75mm which is an amazing portrait lens.

All 6-bit coded Leica lenses are a plug and play with the SL’s and with the size of the Summilux’s, feel like you have an R5/R6 back in your hands again.
Being able to swap back and forth from SL to M body depending on the work or even using both bodies (since the UI’s are identical) is awesome. I was bored with digital, it was a tool for work, film was where I had my fun. But the SL system brought the fun back to digital.

I forgot that people like pics here

The greeting from your Summilux 50/1.4 is actually more compelling since it is in response to a rant about a one lens kit. Curious. I could understand why, but would you choose it over a Summicron 50/2?
I made the transition to digital professionally in 2012, and have shot Nikon DSLR’s since (D4,D850,D6). I came to love them as very capable tools and Nikon PC lenses worked well for most architectural work (and gave me some manual focus joy). I resisted moving to mirrorless as my exposure was with Sony (we have a couple early Sony adopters in my office) and the UI and handling of those cameras is awful- way too many menus and they feel like a toy.

I migrated to Leica SL (SL2&SL2S) last year and it’s been a revelation. Yes, the EVF takes some getting used to (will always love an SLR), but the Leica EVF is the best in the business currently. Further the SL system is a Swiss Army knife, use it with Sigma or Panasonic glass (both of which are insanely good and offer specialty lenses outside Leica’s current SL offerings like Macro’s and super Tele’s) Canon T/S lenses with a Sigma adapter (tried to use Nikon PC with Novoflex but the Canon lenses are more friendly with the electronics in the SL) Nikon manual focus with adapter and the M adapter allows me to use my M mount lenses including my Voigtlander lenses like the 10mm (which is rectilinear) and 75mm which is an amazing portrait lens.

All 6-bit coded Leica lenses are a plug and play with the SL’s and with the size of the Summilux’s, feel like you have an R5/R6 back in your hands again.
Being able to swap back and forth from SL to M body depending on the work or even using both bodies (since the UI’s are identical) is awesome. I was bored with digital, it was a tool for work, film was where I had my fun. But the SL system brought the fun back to digital.

I forgot that people like pics here
No disputing that Leica is one of the most premium options available in small format. Like a Patek complication, not available to everyone though. It is a good thing that certain people migrate to the finest possible options, and are able to share the satisfaction of capturing an ultimate image. My question: If you had an SL2S in your bag, and only could take one lens for a whirlwind trip around the world in a hot air balloon, what would it be?
 
Posts
348
Likes
344
Since I am aware that you have an aversion to digital imagery, which is admirable, I am trying to figure out if you are warning me that my sensor is tracking me (grin), or that in reality the sensor is still doing some of the work even if you are shooting in Manual mode? I usually shoot in Aperture Priority in either case, so regardless I am still a cheater to a purist.


The greeting from your Summilux 50/1.4 is actually more compelling since it is in response to a rant about a one lens kit. Curious. I could understand why, but would you choose it over a Summicron 50/2?

No disputing that Leica is one of the most premium options available in small format. Like a Patek complication, not available to everyone though. It is a good thing that certain people migrate to the finest possible options, and are able to share the satisfaction of capturing an ultimate image. My question: If you had an SL2S in your bag, and only could take one lens for a whirlwind trip around the world in a hot air balloon, what would it be?
Another question would be: The Nikon PC lens was a rather specific tool meant to provide options for correction that were previously available with a bellows. My mom used one when she was a Century 21 real estate photographer in the 70's. Does Leica make an equivalent lens?
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,889
Since I am aware that you have an aversion to digital imagery, which is admirable, I am trying to figure out if you are warning me that my sensor is tracking me (grin), or that in reality the sensor is still doing some of the work even if you are shooting in Manual mode? I usually shoot in Aperture Priority in either case, so regardless I am still a cheater to a purist.


The greeting from your Summilux 50/1.4 is actually more compelling since it is in response to a rant about a one lens kit. Curious. I could understand why, but would you choose it over a Summicron 50/2?

No disputing that Leica is one of the most premium options available in small format. Like a Patek complication, not available to everyone though. It is a good thing that certain people migrate to the finest possible options, and are able to share the satisfaction of capturing an ultimate image. My question: If you had an SL2S in your bag, and only could take one lens for a whirlwind trip around the world in a hot air balloon, what would it be?
I am a working photographer, I do construction, architectural, and event photography- I work my cameras to death and put them through the wringer. I have always shot Leica M for fun (all bought used as I couldn’t afford new) and never looked at Leica as “precious”, premium-yes, but their bodies are incredibly robust and glass spectacular.
The SL’s are actually very approachable- around the same price as a Nikon Z9, Sony A1 or whatever Canon is offering these days. The versatile and robust construction of the SL put them back into the Pro- league (the loss of the R series was sad for many pro’s) and although M’s are “professional”cameras, they aren’t practical for most daily shooting. So I think Leica is trying to appeal to pro shooters with the SL and not the doctors and lawyers that buy the M’s for vacations jewelry.

As far as a one lens kit on the SL, I would say probably SL2S (better in low light than the SL with half the MP) and a 35 Summilux. The Summilux’s are just as sharp as the Summicrons at f2, they get a little creamy swirly at the edges at 1.4 but when you need that extra speed, you are glad you have it.
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,889
Another question would be: The Nikon PC lens was a rather specific tool meant to provide options for correction that were previously available with a bellows. My mom used one when she was a Century 21 real estate photographer in the 70's. Does Leica make an equivalent lens?
Schneider made a 21mm PC lens for the Leicaflex system (I have one) but don’t think Leica ever made their own.
The current Nikon and Canon PC lenses are spectacular. The canon edge out the Nikon on the wide (the 17 canon is a touch sharper than the 19 Nikon) and at 24mm the canon is better than the Nikon. The Nikon 45 and 85 are both incredible lenses for product and environmental portraiture (shooting a subject in a hall of columns).
I currently use the Canon PC lenses on Leica SL and with the Sigma Canon/SL adapter you have full communication between the camera and body (auto aperture indexing) whereas with the Novoflex adapter with Nikon- they don’t play as well,
 
Posts
348
Likes
344
I am a working photographer, I do construction, architectural, and event photography- I work my cameras to death and put them through the wringer. I have always shot Leica M for fun (all bought used as I couldn’t afford new) and never looked at Leica as “precious”, premium-yes, but their bodies are incredibly robust and glass spectacular.
The SL’s are actually very approachable- around the same price as a Nikon Z9, Sony A1 or whatever Canon is offering these days. The versatile and robust construction of the SL put them back into the Pro- league (the loss of the R series was sad for many pro’s) and although M’s are “professional”cameras, they aren’t practical for most daily shooting. So I think Leica is trying to appeal to pro shooters with the SL and not the doctors and lawyers that buy the M’s for vacations jewelry.

As far as a one lens kit on the SL, I would say probably SL2S (better in low light than the SL with half the MP) and a 35 Summilux. The Summilux’s are just as sharp as the Summicrons at f2, they get a little creamy swirly at the edges at 1.4 but when you need that extra speed, you are glad you have it.
Following your comments I will officially start researching the SL2S for a future body. And I understand the lower resolution choice, having shot Nikon DSLR's for a decade. I am getting from what you have stated that it as flexible as the e-mount I am currently using. The 35 Summilux is an interesting choice. Particularly since on a "crop factor" sensor (I appreciate the free "reach" when shooting wildlife) it is equivalent normal. Was not aware that it resolved as well as the Summicron f2. Thx, this is helpful stuff to an auld guy
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,889
Following your comments I will officially start researching the SL2S for a future body. And I understand the lower resolution choice, having shot Nikon DSLR's for a decade. I am getting from what you have stated that it as flexible as the e-mount I am currently using. The 35 Summilux is an interesting choice. Particularly since on a "crop factor" sensor (I appreciate the free "reach" when shooting wildlife) it is equivalent normal. Was not aware that it resolved as well as the Summicron f2. Thx, this is helpful stuff to an auld guy
Not sure which camera is the crop sensor you are think about- the SL2 is full frame so 35 is 35.
 
Posts
348
Likes
344
Schneider made a 21mm PC lens for the Leicaflex system (I have one) but don’t think Leica ever made their own.
The current Nikon and Canon PC lenses are spectacular. The canon edge out the Nikon on the wide (the 17 canon is a touch sharper than the 19 Nikon) and at 24mm the canon is better than the Nikon. The Nikon 45 and 85 are both incredible lenses for product and environmental portraiture (shooting a subject in a hall of columns).
I currently use the Canon PC lenses on Leica SL and with the Sigma Canon/SL adapter you have full communication between the camera and body (auto aperture indexing) whereas with the Novoflex adapter with Nikon- they don’t play as well,
I got sidetracked and thought about the never ending Nikon/Canon saga and recalled this old video:
For me, being that I am primarily interested in MF glass, I am still in the Nikon camp for DSLR. Now that both Canon and Nikon are making up ground on mirrorless, well I am probably more interested in that SL2S for the moment. It does have focus peaking?
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,889
People like you put the elves in Wetzlar out of work with choosing lenses by performance and not by name.
Not good, not good. 😉
I have the Leica zooms for the SL (I should qualify that my office owns my Leica gear- it is my “kit” but I didn’t pay for it), they are awesome but heavy as hell and unwieldy. The Sigma and Panasonic zooms are on par for sharpness and they are part of the L-mount alliance with Leica, so all working together within the same eco-system. Plus the quality of the LUMIX and Sigma glass is insane compared to a decade ago. I used to turn my nose up at second party glass but it’s a different world now.
I used to only buy Leica glass in a given focal length even if there was an alternative (like Zeiss of Voightlander) but when they fall outside of the focal length that leica makes (like the 15mm Zeiss or 10mm VT) it was easy to “justify”.
 
Posts
348
Likes
344
Not sure which camera is the crop sensor you are think about- the SL2 is full frame so 35 is 35.
I was thinking about using it on a Sony a6000
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,889
I got sidetracked and thought about the never ending Nikon/Canon saga and recalled this old video:
For me, being that I am primarily interested in MF glass, I am still in the Nikon camp for DSLR. Now that both Canon and Nikon are making up ground on mirrorless, well I am probably more interested in that SL2S for the moment. It does have focus peaking?
Yes, focus peaking (which you can turn off) and auto- punch-in which is amazing.
When you turn the barrel on a Leica coded MF lens it zooms in on the center of the frame for loupe type focus and when you stop moving the focus ring it zooms back out to full frame. It does this almost instantly so you don’t lose that fraction of a second composing- once you get used to it. With uncoded older lenses or adapted lenses it won’t auto zoom but you just push the nipple on the back and it will zoom and push it again and it zooms back out. It sounds clumsy but you get fast at it
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,889
I was thinking about using it on a Sony a6000
Oh, the lens! Yes, on a crop sensor it will be a 50. But if you want manual focus on Sony, Voightlander does a series of E-mount lenses that are awesome. One of the Sony shooters in my office has gone almost exclusively to the VT manual focus lenses on his A1’s. His imaging with those lenses is stunning- much more creamy and smooth than the Sony glass which I find incredibly sterile and lifeless- sharp, but boring
 
Posts
348
Likes
344
I have the Leica zooms for the SL (I should qualify that my office owns my Leica gear- it is my “kit” but I didn’t pay for it), they are awesome but heavy as hell and unwieldy. The Sigma and Panasonic zooms are on par for sharpness and they are part of the L-mount alliance with Leica, so all working together within the same eco-system. Plus the quality of the LUMIX and Sigma glass is insane compared to a decade ago. I used to turn my nose up at second party glass but it’s a different world now.
I used to only buy Leica glass in a given focal length even if there was an alternative (like Zeiss of Voightlander) but when they fall outside of the focal length that leica makes (like the 15mm Zeiss or 10mm VT) it was easy to “justify”.
I was a staff shooter for a radio station like three decades ago, back then only a couple handfuls of people in my town knew their way around film. So I understand the joys of not having to go broke building your kit. Sounds like your office let you make the choices, which is even better. My mom passed a couple of years ago, but she was shooting to the end. I was shocked when she started buying Sigmas over Nikkors, but now I get it. My only experience with Lumix is in the early days of mirrorless when I was trying both Oly and Panasonic. I understood the collaboration with Leica, but didn't have any of that premium glass so I have heard, but can't personally speak to that.
 
Posts
348
Likes
344
Yes, focus peaking (which you can turn off) and auto- punch-in which is amazing.
When you turn the barrel on a Leica coded MF lens it zooms in on the center of the frame for loupe type focus and when you stop moving the focus ring it zooms back out to full frame. It does this almost instantly so you don’t lose that fraction of a second composing- once you get used to it. With uncoded older lenses or adapted lenses it won’t auto zoom but you just push the nipple on the back and it will zoom and push it again and it zooms back out. It sounds clumsy but you get fast at it
That's some wild tech! No one carries Leica in Reno, so I will have to head over the hill to Sac or SF to try it out
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,889
That's some wild tech! No one carries Leica in Reno, so I will have to head over the hill to Sac or SF to try it out
The Leica store in SF is owned by Camera West- been dealing with them for 20 years, good people and their used selections are awesome

https://www.camerawest.com/
 
Posts
64
Likes
230
My first real camera setup. My father gave it to me when I was 10. He borrowed it back to use on one of his electron microscopes (he was a metallurgist who did destructive testing and failure analysis), and continued to use it until his death at age 85. He had dozens of high-end cameras of all types over his lifetime for professional and personal use, but we both loved this workhorse for its reliability and simplicity.

(Ignore ther flowers- I'm not attempting an artistic statement and clearly my composition is garbage. Just using what's at hand to prop up the camera.)