Forums Latest Members

Vintage Speedy help. Can anybody tell me what this might be?

  1. Dash1 Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    1,824
    Likes
    3,501
    Stunning Speedy! The only Omega I've had that still retained the red wax was a ploprof.
     
  2. Nathan1967 Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    1,413
    Likes
    2,836
    Personally, I liked the "old peel and reveal" technique to premiere the new Speedmaster.

    Great watch too!

    Nathan
     
    ndgal likes this.
  3. noiseboyuk Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    414
    Likes
    884
    Notwithstanding the 'red dot' query - that is a very nice watch.
     
    ndgal likes this.
  4. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Looks great indeed. Do you happen to know which reference the watch is? I can think of 3 that it might be? Or do you have to open the case and lose your red marker to know what you bought?
     
    Edited Jun 21, 2017
    watchknut likes this.
  5. Cad290 Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    676
    Likes
    1,042
    Yeah I was going to ask if that means you bought the watch without looking inside?
     
  6. Rumar89 Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    810
    Likes
    1,599
    Beautiful watch, congrats on the grail! Wear it in good health.
     
    ndgal likes this.
  7. Jackee Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    57
    Likes
    15
    Congrats on a really nice watch!
     
    ndgal likes this.
  8. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    26,440
    Likes
    65,417
    The red and blue dots are model paint (Revell brand to be exact), not wax. Red dots were added at the factory, and blue dots were added after factory service. Both were discontinued in June of 2015.

    As an anti-tampering device, they were pretty poor. If you were careful the dot would split when the case back was removed and you could line it up again when you closed the watch - the seam would disappear unless you used some decent magnification to see it. I have run cases through the ultrasonic tank and they still had the dot on them when they came out, so it really doesn't have much significance in terms of the watch "never being opened" or anything like that.

    As noted, anyone can buy some model paint and put a dot on the watch, and I think in the end this is why Omega discontinued the practice as it was largely ineffective.

    Cheers, Al
     
  9. TwistedVicar Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    55
    Likes
    253
    Al, Any idea when Omega started to use the red dot?
     
  10. ndgal Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    Thanks!
    Why wouldn't the bracelet be original to the watch?
    I mean, it even came in the original box..

    [​IMG]
     
    Seaborg and Taddyangle like this.
  11. Davidt Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    10,398
    Likes
    18,066
    It looks like it could be an 1175 bracelet? Given that this looks like a 145.012 or 145.022 transitional, it's probably slightly too late to be original, unless the watch sat in a dealership for a number of years.
     
    Speedy Gonzales likes this.
  12. ndgal Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    The caseback has been opened.
    Notice the part of the wax seal on the caseback side is gone already.

    [​IMG]

    Luckily, whoever opened the watch managed to leave a nice "Scar" on the caseback (look right above pushers) when the opener tool slipped on them... ::facepalm2:::whipped:(the person I bought the watch from took it to get it appraised... you know how that goes...). I can only assume it happened at that time, because the watch looks like it was hardly worn (if ever...).

    [​IMG]
     
  13. ndgal Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    It is a 1175.
     
  14. uwsearch Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    1,055
    Likes
    1,596
    1175 are dated... check it and you'll know..
     
  15. davten Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    201
    Likes
    1,417
    Lovely watch. Congrats!
     
  16. ndgal Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    No date that I could find anywhere. Or am I missing something? ::confused2::


    [​IMG]
     
  17. Davidt Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    10,398
    Likes
    18,066
    The later 70's ones weren't usually dated.

    I'm swaying towards service bracelet. Still a great set.
     
  18. ndgal Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    Funny you say "Set", because it also came with these knick knacks...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  19. watchknut New watch + Instagram + wife = dumbass Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    4,025
    Likes
    13,790
    Jesus...in 10 posts you will have a pic of the receipt and then in a few more a pic of the owner...and then a few more a pic of the archive letter.

    I kind of like the piecemeal reveal...

    So what reference is IT? Killer piece...
     
  20. ndgal Jun 21, 2017

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    Whoops, sorry, It's a 145.012

    An no, no pictures of the owner (which I actually asked for).
    I was told by the grandson (whom I bought the watch from) that he will try looking for some, but he said "Honestly, I can't really remember him wearing it, it was just sitting in a closet for all of these years"

    And this is the last picture, (I promise..) :taunt:

    [​IMG]
     
    gemini4 likes this.