Vintage Speedmaster beginner test!

Posts

2,243

Likes

3,067

Passover

·Sep 23, 2021

For the members starting into vintage Speedmasters and who already gained some knowledge:

Which parts visiable in these pictures are correct for a 105.012-65 (despite the watch case) ??

Not too many as it seems... 🙁










Good luck!

 

Posts

1,143

Likes

3,111

perks713

·Sep 23, 2021

I think someone etched 'Chrono24.com' onto the watch, which I believe is not original.

 

Posts

2,243

Likes

3,067

Passover

·Sep 23, 2021

perks713

I think someone etched 'Chrono24.com' onto the watch, which I believe is not original.

Close but not corrcet 😉

 

Posts

932

Likes

1,041

vienna

·Sep 23, 2021

just the subdial hands seem to be correct to me.

kind regards Max

 

Posts

2,510

Likes

3,734

rcs914

·Sep 23, 2021

Pretty sure that is a -74 with a replacement modern bezel. If the caseback says -65 I think someone swapped it. Seriously - does it actually have a 321? Because that dial shouldn't fit a 321.

 

Posts

2,243

Likes

3,067

Passover

·Sep 23, 2021

rcs914

Pretty sure that is a -74 with a replacement modern bezel. If the caseback says -65 I think someone swapped it. Seriously - does it actually have a 321? Because that dial shouldn't fit a 321.

321 is inside

 

M

Posts

383

Likes

268

myatt

·Sep 23, 2021

Then everything would be incorrect 😵‍💫 including dial, bezel and hands.👎

 

Posts

24,613

Likes

54,657

Dan S

·Sep 23, 2021

Pushers are good. 👍

 

Posts

2,243

Likes

3,067

Passover

·Sep 23, 2021

Dan S

Pushers are good. 👍

That was my thought also 😀

 

Posts

1,072

Likes

1,482

Dgercp

·Sep 23, 2021

Dan S

Pushers are good. 👍

Didn't he say beginners 😀

 

Posts

1,565

Likes

3,676

Seaborg

·Sep 23, 2021

Poor Speedy