Vintage Sm300 head count!

Melhadary

Couldn't miss out on this thread! 😀
Vintage SM 300's to me are represented by my:
CK 2913 on jubilee,

CK14755 on 7912/6 bracelet combination,

and the still missing from the collection 165.014 🙁

Queue

Untitled by j0hnnycache, on Flickr

Nice straight lugs

Untitled by j0hnnycache, on Flickr

estrickland

Nice one, Ben.

After previous seller pic, here's mine on the wrist:

Ben5513

Hi all,

Any sm300 lover out there?

I'm new to omega, but when I strap this on there's an instant love😀



[/IMG]



Hope to see yours here as well!
Ben

250scr

Jealous

Northernman

Posted my previous SM300 early in this tread. Now doing service with a good friend of mine.
This one took over:

Traveler

This is a club that I have been looking to join for a long while, and I am very excited to have just received my (first?!) vintage SM300... I love it, especially on the original 1056 bracelet, but I wanted to hear any theories about one particular part - the hands. As you can see they have certainly seen better days, and according to the original owner ( as told to the dealer that I transacted with ) they are 100% original to the watch ( purchased by him mid 60s ). The watch does appear in fantastic used but unpolished condition. The hands are intriguing as they are pre-sword baton hands - but they are thinner than any set I gave seen until now. My first thought was of Speedmaster hands, but they look different to my 105.012's (my only handy reference point)... What do the members think? Anyway, I love the look and feel of this thing...thanks!
..

Traveler

This is a club that I have been looking to join for a long while, and I am very excited to have just received my (first?!) vintage SM300... I love it, especially on the original 1056 bracelet, but I wanted to hear any theories about one particular part - the hands. As you can see they have certainly seen better days, and according to the original owner ( as told to the dealer that I transacted with ) they are 100% original to the watch ( purchased by him mid 60s ). The watch does appear in fantastic used but unpolished condition. The hands are intriguing as they are pre-sword baton hands - but they are thinner than any set I gave seen until now. My first thought was of Speedmaster hands, but they look different to my 105.012's (my only handy reference point)... What do the members think? Anyway, I love the look and feel of this thing...thanks!
..