Forums Latest Members
  1. Radiozoop Apr 20, 2018

    Posts
    200
    Likes
    274
    Hi all,

    I recently had the honor of purchasing this 321 Seamaster ref. 2451 from a local jeweler who had it on consignment. Needless to say, I purchased the watch at an insanely low price and I couldn't walk out without it. I've been on the look out for a Cal. 321 Seamaster for a while because a 321 Speedmaster is way out of my price range. I think the watch is in great shape, along with a nicely patina'd dial, but you tell me: How did I do?

    First, the wrist shot! Please note: The scratches apparent are not on the dial itself, but on the crystal. I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir but this dial is awesome. I love the beige, off white patina. Very attractive!

    [​IMG]

    Next, a stereotypical "watch on the fence post for hipster-esque cred" shot:

    [​IMG]

    My grandfather recently passed, and since we're both engineers, he gave me his slide rules. Figured I'd use them to get another "artsy" shot of my Seamaster in its natural habitat:

    [​IMG]

    Finally, here is the movement. It's in great condition, all original (99% sure, at least), and recently serviced by my personal watchmaker. He was careful to not replace anything that was on the watch, but he gave it a good clean and oil.

    [​IMG]

    Thanks for viewing my post and your advice on this watch!
     
    Edited Apr 20, 2018
    Hattrick, gemini4, Vitezi and 6 others like this.
  2. cristos71 Apr 20, 2018

    Posts
    7,157
    Likes
    32,939
    Very nice watch, I actually am wearing a very similar one today, but I think without Seamaster on the dial it is 'just' a 321 chrono and not a SM.
     
    Radiozoop likes this.
  3. Radiozoop Apr 20, 2018

    Posts
    200
    Likes
    274
    Would this be considered "pre-seamster" since this exact reference was branded shortly after this piece was manufactured?
     
  4. cristos71 Apr 20, 2018

    Posts
    7,157
    Likes
    32,939
    I'd say so yes.
     
    Radiozoop likes this.
  5. Fabulon Apr 20, 2018

    Posts
    202
    Likes
    1,297
    Very beautiful Watch with a very nice Patina :thumbsup: Gongrats!
     
    Radiozoop likes this.
  6. marco Apr 21, 2018

    Posts
    1,252
    Likes
    2,991
    Beautiful example, well done.
     
  7. Radiozoop Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    200
    Likes
    274
    Quick bump because I came back to this thread to ask a question:

    I understand this is a CK2451, but can anyone tell me what version it is (for example, “CK2451-6?”) Also, what would be the original bracelet model be? I know it was a beards of rice type bracelet but I’d like to know the model number so I can order an original.
     
  8. cristos71 Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    7,157
    Likes
    32,939
    The 'version' will be clear to see on the inside of your case back. From your earlier picture I can't make it out.

    I don't think there will be a designated bracelet for this reference. You can try a BOR but will be dependent on well fitting end links to achieve a good look.

    I prefer to find vintage or vintage look 18mm bracelets with straight ends for some of my 1940's and 50's Omega's if I fancy a change from a leather strap.

    This bracelet cost about €50 on Ebay IIRC and I think it looks quite good.

    20180509_150844.jpg
     
    Vitezi, marco and Radiozoop like this.
  9. Radiozoop Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    200
    Likes
    274
    Thanks! I suppose I should have said reference and not version. I’ve had the case open once and don’t recall noticing anything other than “CK 2451.” I’ll look tomorrow to confirm.

    Do you think a 1068 BOR bracelet would be period correct for my watch?

    Edit: Oh, and also, every other CK 2451-7 (the reference I’ve found that is most similar using some google-fu) has an actual numerical “12” marker as the top indicator. That is the only thing tripping me up with my research.
     
    Edited Sep 10, 2018
  10. cristos71 Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    7,157
    Likes
    32,939
    Looks like it could be a -7

    20180910_100621.jpg
     
    Radiozoop likes this.
  11. Radiozoop Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    200
    Likes
    274
    Thanks! I should be more attentative to my own pictures :)
     
    Edited Sep 10, 2018