Forums Latest Members

Vintage Longines Divers - Bad Luck Streak Continues

  1. danomar Apr 25, 2013

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    1,307
    A while ago, I got a Longines 8484 diver with hummer movement:

    DialLongines8484.jpg

    Looks nice, but half of the bezel was stripped of teeth underneath and was very loose. The crown gasket melted onto the winding tube. The bracelet and end links were atrociously polished and bent beyond recognition. And of course, the date would not advance. I got lucky and the seller refunded my money.

    Thinking it might prove a better piece, I recently got this 7970-3:

    IMG_5877s.JPG

    Looks nice, yes?

    Oh wait, move the watch a little in the light and the dial's condition becomes apparent:

    IMG_5878s.JPG

    IMG_5891s.JPG

    I knew the bezel was cosmetically rough. No problem. The case is in decent, perhaps good condition.

    IMG_5880s.JPG

    IMG_5885s.JPG

    The movement, however, appears to have bits of oxidation all over. Or else that is graphite lubricant making a mess.

    IMG_5896s.JPG

    IMG_5897s.JPG

    Something got messy on the caseback and will not come off. Moisture damage?

    IMG_5899s.JPG

    All said, however, I like the watch. The size and shape suit me. I am worried about the movement, though. It seems to keep time well enough, but the sweep seconds hand moves erratically, especially between 12 and 6.

    Would those of you familiar with the high-beat 431 movement mind taking a moment to watch this video to see it anything seems amiss?

    http://s608.photobucket.com/user/camuswasnoexistentialist/library/Longines7970

    I just don't seem to win when it comes to Longines divers! :-(
     
  2. danomar Apr 25, 2013

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    1,307
  3. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Apr 26, 2013

    Posts
    26,469
    Likes
    65,614
    The movement does not look bad at all in those photos - yes there is some debris there, but that's not unusual for a vintage movement that would need servicing. The sweep hand might be a little irregular, but that should be an easy fix at service. This movement uses an indirectly driven sweep hand, and has a friction spring like many of these designs do - see here:

    [​IMG]

    The spring is the gold coloured flat piece at the red arrow - usually adjusting the tension of this spring (on a properly serviced watch) will eliminate any jittery hand movements.

    Swatch Group no longer supplies parts for these watches, so you would be relying on the open market for the parts - for example these use a sealed mainspring barrel that is intended to be replaced as a unit, and I was able to get 2 from my local material supplier, so parts are out there, just not sure if the supply is good for all parts.

    Cheers, Al
     
  4. danomar Apr 26, 2013

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    1,307
    Many thanks, Al. That helps assuage a few of my fears.

    I noticed yesterday that the winding rotor weight was loose on its carrier. This is visible in the movement photos above—the gap between the "Longines" carrier and outer weight. I gently nudged it back in, but once again, it makes me wonder if this is a keeper.
     
  5. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Apr 26, 2013

    Posts
    26,469
    Likes
    65,614
    Ah yes I missed that as I was too busy looking for rust. Although I can't say for sure with this movement, typically they can be fixed quite easily. Here is an example on an ETA 7750 based watch - PAM104 - where you can see the weight came completely off:

    [​IMG]

    It snapped back in place quite easily:

    [​IMG]

    I suspect yours would be the same, but it's something that should be done before you wear the watch much. along with a service.

    Cheers, Al
     
  6. dragoman Sep 18, 2013

    Posts
    329
    Likes
    483
    Hi, I ended buying this watch after danomar returned it.

    The dial is quite crackeled, but I am OK with it.

    The movement, on the other hand, is quite beaten up. I took it to my watchmaker, who cleaned it (he told me it was quite dirty) and the recommended me not to wind it up manually, because some wheel (??) was worn out. The second hand jitters like crazy...

    Out to out, I don't regret having bought the watch, but now that it is mine, I wouldn't mind having paid something more for a better kept piece.
    I suppose that's the way with vintage watches. From time to time you hit the jackpot, but usually the best you can say is that you get what you paid for...
     
    cicindela and STANDY like this.