Forums Latest Members
  1. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Dec 3, 2015

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    5 digit serial number is strange. See sellers comments below

    http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=281860060383&globalID=EBAY-USPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

    image.jpeg image.jpeg

    Edit: Seller lists the dial as original but redone. Regarding the movement, Seller insists the movement is a very early 321 movement, but not labeled 321, and the serial number is correct. He maintains that Omega serial numbers were haphazard in the 1940's.
     
    Edited Dec 3, 2015
  2. JohnSteed Dec 3, 2015

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Dial original but redone. Yup!

    Movement needs further study. Possible I guess...
     
    arkstfan likes this.
  3. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Dec 3, 2015

    Posts
    12,629
    Likes
    29,961
    If I had to guess, I'd say its an Omega bridge on an non Omega Lemania movement from another watch.
     
  4. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Dec 3, 2015

    Posts
    26,999
    Likes
    32,719
    Yeap, the Lemania serials on these are typically 5 digits so thats most likely what it is. Seller gets points for trying on the "Omega was haphazard in the 40s" statement though.