Forums Latest Members

Vile franken or quirky custom mod? (Speedmaster ref. 145.012)

  1. Dedalus05 Jan 18, 2020

    Posts
    414
    Likes
    831
    So I am looking at a ref. 145.012. Reasonably affordable, but then again that is because there are no bids at present. That could mean no one is interested because it is a vile franken, or it's just early days. Anyway, it appears to have correct applied logo, 'Professional' printed on the dial, DON bazel, and an appropriate teardrop chrono hand. I am not literate on pushers and crown, so can't tell one way or another in that regard - but safe to presume they were replaced at some point(!?).

    Capture.JPG

    Comes with an extract:
    Capture1.JPG

    Faded bazel to blue (DON) that I happen to find attractive:
    Capture2.JPG

    And then the shocker! This caseback on a watch delivered in '68:
    Capture3.JPG

    So for a noob, with shallow pockets. What do you think of the idea of purchasing this watch, and perhaps putting a sapphire caseback on it to show off the 321 movement, and to replace what I presume is a despicable impostor?
     
  2. Davidt Jan 18, 2020

    Posts
    10,409
    Likes
    18,103
    They're two different watches.
     
    DaveK, 89-0, Badwolf and 1 other person like this.
  3. Dedalus05 Jan 18, 2020

    Posts
    414
    Likes
    831
    Help me out, what gives it away?

    EDIT - OMG! - the applied logo for one.
    EDIT2 - The bloody DON! I thought it was the lighting and didn't double check the details.
     
  4. Denarius Jan 18, 2020

    Posts
    188
    Likes
    310
    Better ask whats going on..
     
    Edited Jan 18, 2020
  5. Dedalus05 Jan 18, 2020

    Posts
    414
    Likes
    831
    I just did. Asked for pics of case-back and movement. I'll post em here, as my guess is this ship has sailed for me.
     
    Edited Jan 18, 2020
  6. Denarius Jan 18, 2020

    Posts
    188
    Likes
    310
    I suspect they have two Speedmasters and got the images mixed up, if you dont know about vintage Speedies then I suppose its easy to make that mistake.
     
  7. Aludic @SpeedyBirthYear Jan 18, 2020

    Posts
    1,059
    Likes
    4,867
    Another clue; long versus short indices. :) Or the different bracelets (flat link 1039) versus ‘standard’ 1171.
     
  8. Dgercp Jan 18, 2020

    Posts
    1,072
    Likes
    1,454
    You need a time-out.
     
    89-0 and Dedalus05 like this.