US Army Omega watch

Posts
768
Likes
1,328
Thank you for sharing your observations mac_omega. Now doubly unfortunately I sold my 2179/5 around 3 years ago, ah well, such is life.
 
Posts
13,331
Likes
18,468
observations are: 2179-3 and 2179-5 are mostly the watches with marked casebacks.
I think that 2179/2 had the U.S. Army casebacks as well:

https://www.phillips.com/detail/omega/NY080119/52

I’ve not seen a 2179/5 with the engraving. Do you have a picture of one? This example has an extract that shows original destination as Switzerland.


https://www.misterwolftime.com/product-page/omega-military-calatrava-ref-2179-5-cal-30t2-in-steel

gatorcpa
 
Posts
13,331
Likes
18,468
Hi
Over the years I have seen 2179/3 with marked xase backs . On the 2384. I have to check my notes .
Good hunting

bill
I agree with both of you that 2179/3 have the engraved casebacks. It’s the 2179/5’s that do not.

You were the one who posted pictures showing the differences between the 2384 and 2179 cases side-by-side.

A lot more info here: https://omegaforums.net/threads/a-new-one-in-my-collection-ck-2179-us-army.50009/

gatorcpa
 
Posts
4,643
Likes
9,349
I agree with both of you that 2179/3 have the engraved casebacks. It’s the 2179/5’s that do not.

You were the one who posted pictures showing the differences between the 2384 and 2179 cases side-by-side.
gatorcpa
Hi Evan

I remember I did post side by side of the two cases but dont remember where I did that one ! May be here or maybe Puristpro....

best
Bill
 
Posts
17,974
Likes
37,563
Hi Evan

I remember I did post side by side of the two cases but dont remember where I did that one ! May be here or maybe Puristpro....

best
Bill

Cool avatar Bill

Have you gone all Wild West on us?

😉
 
Posts
3,554
Likes
7,591
I have not saved a foto of 2179-5 but I have a 2179-2 in my possession which has the version C inscription (as per definition of @JimInOz) :

(C) U _ S _ ARMY (not quite underscore, but lower than a dash - mark)


This punch is a bit deeper than usually observed on ref 2179

Obviously the U.S. Army versions are all over the place -2, -3, -5 and what else will show up?

And here a comparison of the 2 U.S.Army models:



The difference is obvious in the side view, from the front they look very similar though
 
Posts
768
Likes
1,328
Thanks guys for all the input on which 2179 was designated US ARMY. What I take from this is that 2179/3, /2 and possibly /5 are all correct. Do we know what the digit after / represents? Is it a batch number?
Mark
 
Posts
5,598
Likes
9,424
So, having Erich`s book for many months now, i have to admit, that it is not very gentle on my finances.....Too many desirable Omegas in there. therefore: i skipped the U.S.Army section. Thought , i know that part..... together with John Diethelm from the Factory, we researched a few Mil. watches in the mid 90`s. unearthed the original order form for the 1942 and 1953 mil. watch batches. found the evidence for the 1963 Railmaster version for Pakistan. Dug out the Omega original military catalogue from 1958 for the Peruvian models. with the old buying prices for the military. i posted all that on the net for collectors. there was no order form for the 1945/46 US Army to be found. So, i hope Erich can activate his museum research contacts one more time to ask for that original contract for the US Army delivery. until then, we found the following in the mid 90`s: it is impossible to draw a conclusion, which sub reference bears the US Army stamping or not. too many were sold to the civilian market and the PX. The only thing, 25 years ago, was an educated guess from the Museum : what came back for repair and restoration and was stamped US Army was sub reference 2179-4. No other 2179 sub reference. and 2384- 1 and 2384-2. no other sub reference. But that was 25 years ago and not very scientific.... good that we might be able to clear that up now with new evidence . i hope, Erich can unearth that order form. must be somewhere in the museum.... kind regards. Achim
 
Posts
13,331
Likes
18,468
Is it a batch number?
That is what I think, although there could be other running changes to design that would cause a change in designation.

Omega was not always consistent.
gatorcpa