Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I'm no bracelet aficionado but I think the 556 end links are meant for an 18mm width lug (which is correct for the 1068 bracelet) but I believe the 168.018 has a 19mm lug spacing?
Perhaps those that know will chime in and confirm/correct this? @Lucasssssss @ConElPueblo
If it hasn't been serviced, make sure you get one done, as the pics of the movt in your original thread show wear on the high points of the rotor
(do you have an image of the inner case-back?)
I'm no bracelet aficionado but I think the 556 end links are meant for an 18mm width lug (which is correct for the 1068 bracelet) but I believe the 168.018 has a 19mm lug spacing?
Perhaps those that know will chime in and confirm/correct this? @Lucasssssss @ConElPueblo
Every time I wear it I’m impressed with what a handsome design it is, especially on a metal bracelet.
Roger that on the 19mm lugs. This model was my first Omega keeper. Every time I wear it I’m impressed with what a handsome design it is, especially on a metal bracelet. Nice shooting.
Correct endlinks are 55/555, I believe.
Nice watch, good price, correct endlinks are 555, the bracelet I have seen most commonly is the 1037.
I have never seen 55 endlinks, but would be happy to be proven wrong.
Thanks @river9
Well, there are feint marks around the outside of the case back but none where I expected to see them around the inner section. (You can see where I thought there was wear on the rotor, adjacent to the ‘Co’)
So, the rub may have been fixed but it is still worth thinking about a service if you intend wearing the watch.
edit
I’m pretty sure you need a new case back gasket anyway.
Hello again
Connie is now in watchmaker hands for service. In the meanwhile I would like to glean info on "beads of rice" bracelet for 168.018 ref above.
Through searches here on OF and googling I didn't find "correct" ref measurements for bracelet and endlinks.
My bracelet is 1036, mounted on 556 endlinks. The 556 endlinks (supposedly 19mm width between lugs but loose on connie 168.018) don't fit my Seamaster ref 136.020 (18mm lug width).
Is that because the previous owner has trimmed 556 endlinks or something else?
In brief: my 556 endlinks are loose on 168.018 but too big for the 18mm lugs width (Seamaster ref 136.020).
Please enlighten me on this aspect.
Thank you and Merry Christmas
Hello again
Connie is now in watchmaker hands for service. In the meanwhile I would like to glean info on "beads of rice" bracelet for 168.018 ref above.
Through searches here on OF and googling I didn't find "correct" ref measurements for bracelet and endlinks.
My bracelet is 1036, mounted on 556 endlinks. The 556 endlinks (supposedly 19mm width between lugs but loose on connie 168.018) don't fit my Seamaster ref 136.020 (18mm lug width).
Is that because the previous owner has trimmed 556 endlinks or something else?
In brief: my 556 endlinks are loose on 168.018 but too big for the 18mm lugs width (Seamaster ref 136.020).
Please enlighten me on this aspect.
Thank you and Merry Christmas