Universale genève compur

Useless AI slop. But it refers to a serial. So do you know the serial?

Do you have a caseback with serial and reference on it?

As I mentioned already, the dial has been reprinted. This is an absolute fact and you don't need to research it any further. Anyone with even slightly passing experience evaluating UG dials can identify this as a reprint. I'm not trying to offend you, just to be direct and clear.
The AI information you received is complete nonsense. It's one of the most garbled and idiotic statements about a UG dial I have ever seen. Which just proves what we already know, you cannot rely on AI for evaluating vintage watches in general.
You previously asked how we know the dial is a reprint, and I don't have the time to answer this in detail. Suffice it to say that literally every single thing about the dial printing is wrong. If you compare this dial against other dials from the same reference that are original, you should be able to identify all the differences, and that that's a very useful exercise to start training your eye.
Many forum members here are expert at dial evaluations, which is based on looking at thousands and thousands of dials over many years. Once you are trained, it often takes a fraction of a second to identify a dial, and you are not even completely consciously aware of how you do it, it just happens. (Occasionally there are dials that are hard to determine, and you may not get a consensus from the forum, but this is not one of those dials).
Because the mid case is completely mangled, and some of the hands are wrong on the dial, there is no point trying to restore this watch, it is a lost cause, worth a little bit for parts and for the melt value of the gold.
I hope you continue along your UG journey by educating yourself, and this forum is a great place to start. There's an Italian forum as well that is very good, and perhaps easier for you to communicate in your native language. Good luck.