Universal Geneve “Prototype” Compax

Posts
2,755
Likes
4,810
😲
Not my discovery. This was suggested in the comments section of a Hodinkee article. I just wanted to provide an illustration to quell any doubts.
 
Posts
69
Likes
150
Not my discovery. This was suggested in the comments section of a Hodinkee article. I just wanted to provide an illustration to quell any doubts.
Well done. There are other sections that could be highlighted as well but I think that makes the point perfectly. Thanks @DirtyDozen12
 
Posts
2,430
Likes
9,801
Not my discovery. This was suggested in the comments section of a Hodinkee article. I just wanted to provide an illustration to quell any doubts.

The vintage watch world need some sort of international tribunal.
 
Posts
7,356
Likes
34,007
This is why it is so important to build up knowledge and stick with what you know.
 
Posts
12,923
Likes
51,662
The vintage watch world need some sort of international tribunal.
 
Posts
17
Likes
95
Just an FYI: I sent the buyer this thread yesterday, he is aware of the situation, and he obviously is free to return the watch. I do not want anyone to purchase a watch from me and not be 100% satisfied.
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,556
The vintage watch world need some sort of international tribunal.

This is it, apparently.
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,050
I am going to reach out to Universal to see if I can get an extract for the watch, and will keep you all posted.
I wouldn't bother with it Adam. They usually can't make heads or tails of their own watches unfortunately. I'm sure they can offer some useful anecdotal information on occasion, but I have found their extracts to be more useless than the ones from other manufactures.

The watch in question and the dial found on chrono24 are one and the same obviously, and it would, at the very least, make this particular watch a franken. Kudos to the people who found the dial. I'd still like to own one to wear, but not at that price. Incorrect rare dial + rare case = 50k is like saying 1 + 1 = eggplant, and the seller is of course doing right by the buyer to offer a refund.
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,050
There are a lot of legit and fantastic watches one could acquire for what this sold for. Numbers don't add up. Seems to me that this is a slippery slope. We've had some fun with this but to me this watch is a sign that the UG market is beyond frothy, that the good watches are so scarce that "Prototypes" are now acceptable.

What am I missing?

Especially in the last few years, almost all clean-looking UG chronographs I've seen for sale are consolidated examples (case/dial/hands from different sources). I enjoy finding unmolested, all-original watches, but there's nothing wrong with people who don't mind incorrect parts, redials, refinished case, etc. as long they are aware of those things before purchasing. It only becomes problematic when these mods are done to viciously gouge potential buyers. I've heard from multiple sources that there are people buying up rare parts, so it's not a good time for UG collecting - each watch needs careful and thoughtful examination. Even the other Spillmann example mentioned in the Hodinkee article has a period incorrect dial (40's case/50's dial). This is nothing new. This has been happening in vintage Rolexes for many, many years.
 
Posts
1,381
Likes
2,920
From what I have seen (and without prejudice), hodinkee has a lot to learn ...
 
Posts
69
Likes
150
In this particular example, I find the explanation/backstory from the dealer to be quite convoluted (sounds like a strange arms deal) and riddled with lots of cya (must be a lawyer by training). I would think when dealing in such "rare" pieces with high price points the diligence would have been much more in depth i.e. the careful and thoughtful examination that's been alluded too as well as full vetting of the origin and source of the watch. In addition, I hope that the buyer has been made aware of all the new developments as well as the other items the dealer has mentioned in this thread because the original listing for the watch makes no mention of being serviced, a pusher having been replaced, the other marks or issues with the dial, etc etc. As @jordn says this is a full blown franken and certainly not worth anything close to the price paid especially given the other replaced parts, etc.
 
Posts
12,923
Likes
51,662
I actually think the article gently pointed to the problem. We all know what went down here.
 
Posts
12,923
Likes
51,662
This is why it is so important to build up knowledge and stick with what you know.
And who you know.
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,050
I actually think the article gently pointed to the problem. We all know what went down here.
We do?
 
Posts
12,923
Likes
51,662
Just restating the obvious.
 
Posts
713
Likes
2,050
Just restating the obvious.
For the sake of objectivity, best not to make any assumptions
 
Posts
12,923
Likes
51,662
Fair point. Moving on.
 
Posts
17
Likes
95
In this particular example, I find the explanation/backstory from the dealer to be quite convoluted (sounds like a strange arms deal) and riddled with lots of cya (must be a lawyer by training). I would think when dealing in such "rare" pieces with high price points the diligence would have been much more in depth i.e. the careful and thoughtful examination that's been alluded too as well as full vetting of the origin and source of the watch. In addition, I hope that the buyer has been made aware of all the new developments as well as the other items the dealer has mentioned in this thread because the original listing for the watch makes no mention of being serviced, a pusher having been replaced, the other marks or issues with the dial, etc etc. As @jordn says this is a full blown franken and certainly not worth anything close to the price paid especially given the other replaced parts, etc.
Matt, the watch was sold prior to my taking pictures and listing it on my website. I only listed it to have the watch for my archives; vain, I know. I was genuinely excited to have brought this watch to market. You don't have to believe my story, nor do you need to purchase a watch from me, that is fine, no hard feelings whatsoever. So you know, the buyer was aware of every flaw on the watch - the pusher, the dent, etc. I didn't find it a prudent use of my time to go into an in-depth description for a watch that was already sold.
 
Posts
754
Likes
2,507
@mentawatches , i don't have any reason to doubt you, your honesty or what you're saying but the dial was on Chrono24... on Chrono24 for God's sake...

I, a small, modest and not specially smart collector, found it in 5 min of research... I don't wanna offend you but don't you think that a 50k watch (and your clients) deserves a little more due diligence?