- Posts
- 18
- Likes
- 75
ultra deep......got it today
- Posts
- 63
- Likes
- 109
mtor91
·Doesnt even look big on your wrist damn
congrats it’s a beauty
congrats it’s a beauty
- Posts
- 2,645
- Likes
- 2,960
- Posts
- 152
- Likes
- 385
JasonF
·Wild watch, congrats - looks fantastic!
- Posts
- 923
- Likes
- 494
- Posts
- 34,269
- Likes
- 38,888
dsio
··Ash @ ΩFYea I think Tom must have a bit of size to him as that watch looks normal sized if anything on his wrist, pretty awesome though.
- Posts
- 369
- Likes
- 2,597
mcemeren
·Looks very nice, wear in good health.
- Posts
- 1,337
- Likes
- 706
spacemission
·The king 👍
- Posts
- 2,710
- Likes
- 17,411
jaguar11
·A real bad boy! So very cool. Wear in good health.
- Posts
- 44
- Likes
- 225
cerberus63
·love it
- Posts
- 103
- Likes
- 374
Horoticus
·Looks great DrTom. What is your wrist size?
- Posts
- 18
- Likes
- 75
DrTom
·Excellent watch, looks great on you!! May I ask where you purchased it? The other two I have seen posted were both from an Omega boutique. Was yours a boutique or authorized dealer?
- Posts
- 94
- Likes
- 272
watcholone
·So, I've joined the Ultra Deep club as well. Settled for the steel version though.
- Posts
- 5,082
- Likes
- 15,701
DaveK
·Just don’t wear it in the shower 
- Posts
- 1,438
- Likes
- 2,213
scapa
·Man, these are stunning watches. Don't think I can carry one off but I love the designs in both Ti and steel.
- Posts
- 783
- Likes
- 1,349
Omega-Q
·That watch was made for your wrist! It would definitely not look good on mine! 😀
- Posts
- 44
- Likes
- 225
cerberus63
·So, I've joined the Ultra Deep club as well. Settled for the steel version though.
- Posts
- 94
- Likes
- 272
watcholone
·I've got mine through an Omega boutique in Switzerland.
My first impressions after the first day:
- It's huge, it's massive, it's a beast
- It's heavy (240g with 3,5 links removed)
- It's thick
- BUT: it wears phenomenally comfortable despite being so heavy (I have 18,5 cm / 7,08 inch wrist). I don't have the feeling that I'm weight-lifting. Omega has done an outstanding job by making this watch so wearable. This is probably the most impressive feature of this watch.
- I wear the bracelet a bit tighter than usual (so the heavy watch does not move around too much on the wrist)
- The new clasp is just wow (it's not wider or higher than the bracelet itself. great job here)
- The O-Megasteel and the ceramic bezel are not too shiny, not too bling-bling
- The dial is relatively small compared to other watches in my collection
- Build quality is outstanding
Long story short: An awesome watch.
The Ultra Deep vs. the Speedmaster 60th anniversary edition (38,6mm)
The Ultra Deep vs. the Omega Seamaster Professional (42mm)
Thickness: The Ultra Deep (18.06 mm) vs. the Omega Seamaster Professional (13.56 mm)
My first impressions after the first day:
- It's huge, it's massive, it's a beast
- It's heavy (240g with 3,5 links removed)
- It's thick
- BUT: it wears phenomenally comfortable despite being so heavy (I have 18,5 cm / 7,08 inch wrist). I don't have the feeling that I'm weight-lifting. Omega has done an outstanding job by making this watch so wearable. This is probably the most impressive feature of this watch.
- I wear the bracelet a bit tighter than usual (so the heavy watch does not move around too much on the wrist)
- The new clasp is just wow (it's not wider or higher than the bracelet itself. great job here)
- The O-Megasteel and the ceramic bezel are not too shiny, not too bling-bling
- The dial is relatively small compared to other watches in my collection
- Build quality is outstanding
Long story short: An awesome watch.
The Ultra Deep vs. the Speedmaster 60th anniversary edition (38,6mm)
The Ultra Deep vs. the Omega Seamaster Professional (42mm)
Thickness: The Ultra Deep (18.06 mm) vs. the Omega Seamaster Professional (13.56 mm)
Edited:
- Posts
- 44
- Likes
- 225
cerberus63
·I've got mine through an Omega boutique in Switzerland.
My first impressions after the first day:
- It's huge, it's massive, it's a beast
- It's heavy (240g with 3,5 links removed)
- It's thick
- BUT: it wears phenomenally comfortable despite being so heavy (I have 18,5 cm / 7,08 inch wrist). I don't have the feeling that I'm weight-lifting. Omega has done an outstanding job by making this watch so wearable. This is probably the most impressive feature of this watch.
- I wear the bracelet a bit tighter than usual (so the heavy watch does not move around too much on the wrist)
- The new clasp is just wow (it's not wider or higher than the bracelet itself. great job here)
- The O-Megasteel and the ceramic bezel are not too shiny, not too bling-bling
- The dial is relatively small compared to other watches in my collection
- Build quality is outstanding
Long story short: An awesome watch.
The Ultra Deep vs. the Speedmaster 60th anniversary edition (38,6mm)
The Ultra Deep vs. the Omega Seamaster Professional (42mm)
Thickness: The Ultra Deep (18.06 mm) vs. the Omega Seamaster Professional (13.56 mm)
- Posts
- 94
- Likes
- 272
watcholone
·I forgot something: the rotating bezel is top-notch. Extremely smooth.
Miles better than on the Seamaster Diver 300 (which is sometimes hard to grab).
And better than on my Seamaster 300 MC (the vintage style one).
Miles better than on the Seamaster Diver 300 (which is sometimes hard to grab).
And better than on my Seamaster 300 MC (the vintage style one).
Similar threads
- Posts
- 1
- Views
- 792
- Posts
- 3
- Views
- 2K
- Posts
- 21
- Views
- 6K
- Posts
- 3
- Views
- 3K
