427shark
·You have your reasoning wrong here.
The Omega has the option for a micro-adjusting clasp (from the Seamaster 300 or PO), something the BB doesn't. Omega wins hands-down.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
You have your reasoning wrong here.
The Omega has the option for a micro-adjusting clasp (from the Seamaster 300 or PO), something the BB doesn't. Omega wins hands-down.
No way , really ? I never thought that Rolex would basically share a movement of tech with breitling .. Is it a 70hr power reserve like Tudor ?
Buying any new, fairly expensive watch comes down to personal preference which, after all, should be immune from criticism. Being adverse to water, many of each watches features are wasted on me. I went with the one I figured would be with me for the rest of my life. I still find myself staring at it and the excitement of opening the box.
Hey all.
So I'm letting go for my 45.5mm PO and looking to fund either the above mentioned watches.
I'm leaning towards the Tudor because of the hands are more unique as compared to the hallowed ones of the SMP.
However I like the SMP height as compared to the Black Bay...
Anyone who has both or was in the same situation as me... which did you choose?
Any regrets?
Cheers
If the BB had a ceramic bezel, I would like it, but I don't conceive a watch in the price point with a aluminum bezel
Although there is the BB steel bezel variant