Tropical 16800 Submariner caught

Posts
1,579
Likes
15,221
Not taking anything away from Rolex and Lord knows we have a few in our collection, but I have found that the longer and deeper one gets into the watch collecting arena the less a good majority of top collectors focus on Rolex. I think it is also geographical as well but mostly depends on what kind of collector. I think real "active" collectors and dealers are prone to Rolex as they are easy to trade in. However I know some very well regarded collectors especially in the tri-state area that bypass Rolex for the most part and seek the more exotic and not necessarily meaning all are expensive. One very humorous NYC collector has always coached me that "Rolex is a hillbilly watch" and he is far from alone in his view. Of course I don't completely agree but I see his point. All one has to do to see his point is peruse some of the online "personal collections" of certain watch forums and hodinkee as well. Most Rolex collections, although presented as "personal collecting journeys" look like everyone else's Rolex collection. Just follow the leader with a bunch of daytonas, over-rated 1655's and a few subs and GMT's. In my opinion Rolex is far from king.
Yeah... I meant that in terms of brand recognition to the mass market and the new investor/collector crowd. The market is driven by that crowd and the watch-as-a-statement crowd. Serious collectors, and I’m not one, would be drawn to better brands with history and gorgeous movements. Names that many Rolex owners have never heard of.
In terms of volume and marketability- Rolex. A Bugatti Chiron is a car many know nothing about, it’s a far superior car to a Mustang, but a lot more Mustangs sell at auction to collectors.
I think we probably agree if we are using the same definitions.
 
Posts
57
Likes
105
That’s a very interesting 16800 - definitely worth owning. Good find.
 
Posts
1,368
Likes
835
Not taking anything away from Rolex and Lord knows we have a few in our collection, but I have found that the longer and deeper one gets into the watch collecting arena the less a good majority of top collectors focus on Rolex. I think it is also geographical as well but mostly depends on what kind of collector. I think real "active" collectors and dealers are prone to Rolex as they are easy to trade in. However I know some very well regarded collectors especially in the tri-state area that bypass Rolex for the most part and seek the more exotic and not necessarily meaning all are expensive. One very humorous NYC collector has always coached me that "Rolex is a hillbilly watch" and he is far from alone in his view. Of course I don't completely agree but I see his point. All one has to do to see his point is peruse some of the online "personal collections" of certain watch forums and hodinkee as well. Most Rolex collections, although presented as "personal collecting journeys" look like everyone else's Rolex collection. Just follow the leader with a bunch of daytonas, over-rated 1655's and a few subs and GMT's. In my opinion Rolex is far from king.

Rolex is king of marketing. Ill give it that. They are a world renowned brand due to their marketing ability. Dont get me wrong, they make a decent watch at least the 5 digit serials 😝. But in terms of overall horology, horological legacy and history, they pale in comparison.
 
Posts
2,171
Likes
15,474
Here’s an interested dial I picked up
”Spider dial” pretty common on Rolex dials from this era.
The lacquer has cracked.