tech396
·I'm all for originality but in this case may consider a re-lume of dial and hands,.......... or just the hands.
My SM300 dial has clearly seen better "lume days" but what's the general consensus.?
I'm thinking of sending this and my hands to "James" for a makeover.
My thoughts are, it's best to keep the original dial as-is, but want to make the watch more presentable. IE polish the crystal, service the movement and have it re-lumed, or just the hands .
It seems the SM300 dials have great looking indices even with the lume mostly missing, so do I leave them alone (showing character) or indulge in a re-lume but using a product without the lasting glow as it would be if the lume were original.. Thoughts ? The hands have zero lume.
My question is based on how much does this hurt value compare to leaving it alone, assuming the re-lume is done to a very high standard.
A general discussion regarding thoughts on re-luming higher value watches is all I'm inquiring about. I've read so many reactions regarding this. I'm just curious.
My SM300 dial has clearly seen better "lume days" but what's the general consensus.?
I'm thinking of sending this and my hands to "James" for a makeover.
My thoughts are, it's best to keep the original dial as-is, but want to make the watch more presentable. IE polish the crystal, service the movement and have it re-lumed, or just the hands .
It seems the SM300 dials have great looking indices even with the lume mostly missing, so do I leave them alone (showing character) or indulge in a re-lume but using a product without the lasting glow as it would be if the lume were original.. Thoughts ? The hands have zero lume.
My question is based on how much does this hurt value compare to leaving it alone, assuming the re-lume is done to a very high standard.
A general discussion regarding thoughts on re-luming higher value watches is all I'm inquiring about. I've read so many reactions regarding this. I'm just curious.
Edited: