Tissot Aquasport Marine Standard Waterproof

Posts
13,361
Likes
31,503
Clearly the case design worked as intended since the dial on this one is in spectacular condition.

 
Posts
1,314
Likes
3,646
Hi,
Outstanding condition for this model (not only the dial, but also the caseback is so well preserved). First time I see the mention Aquasport on the dial. Great find, thanks for sharing.

It is the 1940's case, corresponding to Omega model CK 3683 from 1941 (the third and last evolution of the marine line, equiped with a R17.8 for Omega). As Tissot and Omega were sister commpanies, Tissot had the same lines with Tissot calibers Inside. Do you have a picture of the movement?

My Omega is in a much lesser condition, still hoping to find a better dial. But it has the trident 'Neptune' hands :

dsc_0025.jpg
ck_36810.jpg
ck_36811.jpg
 
Posts
3,184
Likes
3,853
Thanks Yann

I'm still hoping to find a good Marine Standard. In the meantime I just have to satisfy myself with a 2nd execution Marine 😀

3y7asupa.jpg

u8y5azyz.jpg

y8e4enej.jpg

utare9a5.jpg
 
Posts
29,504
Likes
35,459
Thanks Yann

I'm still hoping to find a good Marine Standard. In the meantime I just have to satisfy myself with a 2nd execution Marine 😀

3y7asupa.jpg

u8y5azyz.jpg

y8e4enej.jpg

utare9a5.jpg

Nice!
 
Posts
1,314
Likes
3,646
Thanks Yann

I'm still hoping to find a good Marine Standard. In the meantime I just have to satisfy myself with a 2nd execution Marine 😀

3y7asupa.jpg

u8y5azyz.jpg

y8e4enej.jpg

utare9a5.jpg
Nice!
This is the first execution (CK 679 from 1936 with a 19.4 Inside). The second was the marine standard with a T17 Inside ref CK 3635, the third being the marine standard CK 3683 with a R17.8 Inside. Yours is among what I think is the earlier production of the CK 679, with the short clasp. This ref was also produced with a long clasp. In AJTT, there is a picture of a long clasp marine presented as the first model, but based on my observations, long clasps I have seen have a higher serial number than the short clasp ones. I had asked Marco Richon about this difference but he did not know about the details.

My CK 679 :
00110.jpg
the long clasp :
00210.jpg

My CK 3635 :
dsc_0112.jpg
 
Posts
3,184
Likes
3,853
Very interesting. Based on AJTT I thought the long clasp was the first version, but having now re-read the attached article it looks like you're right and that the long clasp was produced throughout the 1930's - probably at the same time as the short clasp. Judging by the movement no mine is c.1935/6. Unfortunately I didn't take a photo of the movement when I had it opened up.

http://www.nawcc.org/images/stories/Public articles/395_34_45.pdf
 
Posts
3,454
Likes
7,941
Very interesting. Based on AJTT I thought the long clasp was the first version, but having now re-read the attached article it looks like you're right and that the long clasp was produced throughout the 1930's - probably at the same time as the short clasp. Judging by the movement no mine is c.1935/6. Unfortunately I didn't take a photo of the movement when I had it opened up.

http://www.nawcc.org/images/stories/Public articles/395_34_45.pdf
Warren, I've been away, is this the public unveiling of your find? If you intro'd on another thread, I'd love to see it.
 
Posts
1,314
Likes
3,646
Very interesting. Based on AJTT I thought the long clasp was the first version, but having now re-read the attached article it looks like you're right and that the long clasp was produced throughout the 1930's - probably at the same time as the short clasp. Judging by the movement no mine is c.1935/6. Unfortunately I didn't take a photo of the movement when I had it opened up.

http://www.nawcc.org/images/stories/Public articles/395_34_45.pdf
Thanks for this article which I didn't know. It is the first time I read something about long and short clips and answers a question I had for a while now. I understand that the massive clip was the first and then the shorter was launched in 1935. I think like you that the two models have probably been sold in parallel because the serial numbers I've seen on long clasps wer higher than for short ones.
 
Posts
773
Likes
2,427
Here is my short clasp marine.
81y1.jpg

domw.jpg

It has a mysterious engraving on the movement, I do not know what it means.
o0il.jpg
 
Posts
3,184
Likes
3,853
Tamura, that dial is in lovely condition 👍 Interesting that some have "Fab Suisse" and others say nothing. It wasn't routine for watches to be marked as Swiss made at that time.
 
Posts
773
Likes
2,427
Thanks Spiki
I read somewhere that fab. suisse was used in export models only, before swiss made appeared.
 
Posts
1,314
Likes
3,646
Nice watch also in a very good condition. The marking on the movement is a M, if I remember well, it was engraved on movements put in metal (i.e. not gold or silver) cases.