Tiffany signed Seamaster

Posts
215
Likes
923
Fair enough but how do you explain the rest being basically perfect? I guess the red text could have been overprinted more recently but I'd suggest it is unlikely.
The print has been added at best. I don’t see a need digging much further if the dial was untouched before that.
 
Posts
12,938
Likes
22,385
There’s two different questions here. 1) Is the dial original and 2) is the Tiffany script original.

1. The dial is fine - does anyone think otherwise?
2. Tiffany text - ????

I would say that the caseback engraving looks vintage as well. Certainly not done recently. Anyone know what L.O & T.Co stands for?
 
Posts
10,302
Likes
16,124
There’s two different questions here. 1) Is the dial original and 2) is the Tiffany script original.

1. The dial is fine - does anyone think otherwise?
2. Tiffany text - ????

I would say that the caseback engraving looks vintage as well. Certainly not done recently. Anyone know what L.O & T.Co stands for?


The Lago Oil and Transport Company …. possibly!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lago_Oil_and_Transport_Company
 
Posts
215
Likes
923
There’s two different questions here. 1) Is the dial original and 2) is the Tiffany script original.

1. The dial is fine - does anyone think otherwise?
2. Tiffany text - ????

I would say that the caseback engraving looks vintage as well. Certainly not done recently. Anyone know what L.O & T.Co stands for?
Quick google and I would guess Esso - L.O & T.Co is oil related. ”Lago Oil & Transport Co. Ltd”

And some idiot later thought that they could sell T & Co as Tiffany and thus adding the text to the dial. 😀
 
Posts
167
Likes
524
I am not expert so please take it with a pinch of salt. To me beefy lugs, numeral typeface, minute ticks position, clover crown and spearhead for some hour indices all tend to suggest a 50-ish watch. Which is not consistent with rounded S in “Seamaster”.
But it is not the first time I could be wrong. I simply don’t like the combination on the OP dial’s.
I think that the style of the S in the OP watch is consistent with the 50s (round but not symmetrical S). I have seen similar dials, as the one shown after your message, with rounded S and non symmetrical shape, whereas the rounded S with symmetrical shape can only be seen in 60s watches.

As per the originality of the Tiffany stamp, couldn't it have been added later? Like Cartier writings added on Rolex dials.
 
Posts
215
Likes
923
The owner JE Keller worked in the oil business on Aruba. So it is safe to say that the L.O & T.Co stands for ”Lago Oil & Transport Co. Ltd” and that the engraving has nothing to do with the jeweler Tiffany & co.
 
Posts
12,938
Likes
22,385
The owner JE Keller worked in the oil business on Aruba. So it is safe to say that the L.O & T.Co stands for ”Lago Oil & Transport Co. Ltd” and that the engraving has nothing to do with the jeweler Tiffany & co.

Seems like case closed to me
 
Posts
1,497
Likes
5,565
Quick google and I would guess Esso - L.O & T.Co is oil related. ”Lago Oil & Transport Co. Ltd”

And some idiot later thought that they could sell T & Co as Tiffany and thus adding the text to the dial. 😀

I think you nailed it.
 
Posts
411
Likes
626
I think that the style of the S in the OP watch is consistent with the 50s (round but not symmetrical S). I have seen similar dials, as the one shown after your message, with rounded S and non symmetrical shape, whereas the rounded S with symmetrical shape can only be seen in 60s watches.
Very interesting. Tks for clarifying

As per the originality of the Tiffany stamp, couldn't it have been added later? Like Cartier writings added on Rolex dials.
I have a Rolex ref 1501 with Tiffany &Co wordings added apparently afterward by someone who would increase the value. Ink print has different color hue between Tiffany Co and the rest of wordings.
Asked on Rolex forum some respected members there thought that “Tiffany & Co” was added later on.
 
Posts
23,385
Likes
52,009
Asking for opinions on a Tiffany dial is like asking if people believe in extraterrestrial life. There is nothing tangible or concrete to base an opinion on. The legitimate signatures were added afterwards, in different fonts, with different ink, often skewed or off-center. Which also makes them a prime target for counterfeiters.

As a skeptic, the only Tiffany dial I trust is the one that comes with the original purchase receipt. It blows me away that people are willing to pay such high prices for undocumented Tiffany-signed Rolexes. But these days, if something is sold at one of the major auction houses, many buyers take that as proof of authenticity.
 
Posts
2,606
Likes
3,044
Very interesting. Tks for clarifying


I have a Rolex ref 1501 with Tiffany &Co wordings added apparently afterward by someone who would increase the value. Ink print has different color hue between Tiffany Co and the rest of wordings.
Asked on Rolex forum some respected members there thought that “Tiffany & Co” was added later on.

While for a Rolex it's likely that it might be added later on, as @Dan S pointed out, they are a different top print anyway, not below lacquer - with this said don't dismiss or accept things based on other people's opinions

I also don't think very highly of Tiffany Co prints, and for Omega's it doesn't affect value, so I always think what's the point and assume the simple answer is the correct one

If this is redialed maybe the redialer got into the same pitfall as me and thought the T.Co on the engraving is Tiffany Co 😀

Edit: Still I'd put my money on original
 
Posts
6,065
Likes
9,379
Still I'd put my money on original

Still haven’t seen another vintage Omega with red writing ( other than from an absolute ‘leader’)
 
Posts
215
Likes
923
Edit: Still I'd put my money on original
Compare the Tiffany font on the red one and the more correct looking above. There is no chance the first one is good. None. 😀
 
Posts
2,606
Likes
3,044
Still haven’t seen another vintage Omega with red writing ( other than from an absolute ‘leader’)

Maybe in time 😀
 
Posts
2,606
Likes
3,044
Compare the Tiffany font on the red one and the more correct looking above. There is no chance the first one is good. None. 😀

When it comes to Omega's there is no "no chance"

I think you should look at more watches and then consider what a "correct looking" one is

I'm personally surprised how the one @X350 XJR shared passed any aesthetical review, it's a reminder to not put too much stock in Tiffany

There was another recent 14K one shared, bad font and bad placement but the style of stamp @X350 XJR shared was used, I believe that one was original too

In an auction they all fetch the absolute minimum melt value anyway
 
Posts
215
Likes
923
When it comes to Omega's there is no "no chance"

I think you should look at more watches and then consider what a "correct looking" one is

I'm personally surprised how the one @X350 XJR shared passed any aesthetical review, it's a reminder to not put too much stock in Tiffany

There was another recent 14K one shared, bad font and bad placement but the style of stamp @X350 XJR shared was used, I believe that one was original too

In an auction they all fetch the absolute minimum melt value anyway
Tiffany stamped their own dials. Of course the Omega would have similar printing to a Rolex, Patek, Movado or whatever from the same era.

In this case some opportunist saw T.co on the caseback and thought a Tiffany print would give them free money.
Edited: