Community Stories

thoughts on this Omega 14389 cal 268

lo1979
Posts
47
Likes
52
Good morning, I stumble across this watch while looking for a beefy lugs seamaster. ( Still my first choice)
The point is that this watch is located very near where i live so easy deal by cash.
Is this case number more collectable than a beefy lugs seamaster like 2577?
Is this 14389 all original? Price is 680 euros
Many thanks regards
 
1648729313037IMG_20220331_102220.jpg 1648729289214IMG_20220331_102217.jpg 1648729194432IMG_20220331_WA0035.jpg 1648729178369IMG_20220331_WA0050.jpg 1648729167854IMG_20220331_WA0046.jpg 1648729152955IMG_20220331_WA0056.jpg 1648729143704IMG_20220331_WA0043.jpg 1648729094530IMG_20220331_WA0045.jpg 1648729062269IMG_20220331_102213.jpg 1648729021164IMG_20220331_102210.jpg 1648728990165IMG_20220331_102207.jpg
gbesq
Posts
9,529
Likes
52,501
It’s not a particularly rare reference, but it’s one that I like. Case looks unpolished and a linen dial, I think? Looks like it could use a good cleaning. Assume that it will need a service. Price isn’t outrageous.
 
lo1979
Posts
47
Likes
52
gbesq gbesq
It’s not a particularly rare reference, but it’s one that I like. Case looks unpolished and a linen dial, I think? Looks like it could use a good cleaning. Assume that it will need a service. Price isn’t outrageous.

hi, yes it s a linen dial. Does it wear smaller then a 2577 ?

I own a constellation 167005, I don't wear it much because i found it too small.

regards
 
Waltesefalcon
Posts
3,793
Likes
10,359
lo1979 lo1979
hi, yes it s a linen dial. Does it wear smaller then a 2577 ?

I own a constellation 167005, I don't wear it much because i found it too small.

regards

I believe that the 167.005 and the 14389 are both sitting at 34 or 35 mm, so they will wear very similarly. That's also a pretty common size for most vintage watches. If the guy lives nearby I suggest trying it on first if you don't like how your 167.005 wears.

It's looks like a pretty nice example. I'm not sure what the conversion rate is at the moment but that price seems not oulandish. Factor in a service and if you're happy with the price ab the way it fits I'd say buy it.
Edited:
 
gbesq
Posts
9,529
Likes
52,501
Actually, I think that the 14389 is more like 35.5 mm. It definitely wears larger than a 34 mm Connie. I own both. Here’s a photo of my 14389 on my 7.5” wrist.
B1539F16-D13B-49CE-8FD1-01E22446C39F.jpeg
 
MtV
Posts
3,323
Likes
12,939
If a 167.005 at 34.5mm is too small for you, the 35mm of a 14389 will likely also not quite cut it. How about looking at jumbo beefy lug refs, which are about 36mm in diameter?

Collectibility is a subjective matter, but to me this is inferior to the 2577s, the earliest Seamaster (together with the 2576) with bumper automatics and a wide variety of dial configurations, an Omega icon. Which is not to say it’s a bad watch by any means - personally, I just find it less exciting. Anyway, I wouldn’t care so much about collectibility as about your own liking.

Also, the price is on the high side. The slightly dirty movement with different colors of gold-plating and a half-dissolved gasket suggest a service is necessary. The dial, while a slightly more desirable variant, is dirty and unevenly so, note the lighter spot left of the 3-marker, for example. A quick search in the sold items on eBay suggests this wouldn’t fetch 500€ in an auction. I’d say be patient and keep on hunting for the one piece that’s really yours.
 
DON
Posts
2,112
Likes
1,298
I agree with MtV

Case has corrosion, deep scratches in the back and set screw is not original (sits deep in the hole)

Overpriced for the condition and to me if I was still restoring

It would be a parts movement

DON
 
lo1979
Posts
47
Likes
52
MtV MtV
If a 167.005 at 34.5mm is too small for you, the 35mm of a 14389 will likely also not quite cut it. How about looking at jumbo beefy lug refs, which are about 36mm in diameter?

Collectibility is a subjective matter, but to me this is inferior to the 2577s, the earliest Seamaster (together with the 2576) with bumper automatics and a wide variety of dial configurations, an Omega icon. Which is not to say it’s a bad watch by any means - personally, I just find it less exciting. Anyway, I wouldn’t care so much about collectibility as about your own liking.

Also, the price is on the high side. The slightly dirty movement with different colors of gold-plating and a half-dissolved gasket suggest a service is necessary. The dial, while a slightly more desirable variant, is dirty and unevenly so, note the lighter spot left of the 3-marker, for example. A quick search in the sold items on eBay suggests this wouldn’t fetch 500€ in an auction. I’d say be patient and keep on hunting for the one piece that’s really yoursGood morning

good morning to all, many thanks for yours suggestions, what references numbers should I look for a 36 mm jumbo beefy lug refs ?

many thanks regards
 
Geonor
Posts
21
Likes
17
You can also look out for the 2891 Seamaster which has a 36mm diameter with a more flowing look to the lugs which makes it wear a bit bigger. This also has the 266/267 movement which has the more adjustable screw balance instead of the ring balance of the 268.
F4hTZWV.jpg
 
MtV
Posts
3,323
Likes
12,939
Geonor Geonor
You can also look out for the 2891 Seamaster which has a 36mm diameter with a more flowing look to the lugs which makes it wear a bit bigger. This also has the 266/267 movement which has the more adjustable screw balance instead of the ring balance of the 268.
F4hTZWV.jpg

True, though maybe not this particular one, as it’s a redial. 😀
 
Geonor
Posts
21
Likes
17
MtV MtV
True, though maybe not this particular one, as it’s a redial. 😀
Yeah just found a random one online to show the case, which is pretty destroyed by the polishing wheel as well, maybe not the best example lol
 
omegawatchlover
Posts
384
Likes
2,903
It looks great! Non-lume is a plus too because this model used radium sometimes. Looks unpolished and the bevels on the lugs are nice. These wear larger than beefy lug and dog leg lug cases I would expect a cleaner dial at that price point. Price is a bit high. I owned one in the past... manual wind ratchet wheels are a nightmare to me 😵‍💫
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

B

Your take on this Omega 196.0124

Behringer Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
ErichKeane
ErichKeane
Posts
4
Views
212
Pokernico

Asking for your opinion on this Omega 2627 Calendar

Pokernico Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
SOG53
SOG53
Posts
17
Views
443
WatchyWatch

Need opinions on this Omega - Is it a fake or frankenwatch?

WatchyWatch Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Dan S
Dan S
Posts
1
Views
362
O

Thoughts on this Omega kindly

omega1985 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Dan S
Dan S
Posts
9
Views
877
masek

Your thoughts on this Omega Seamaster Ploprof - ref. 166.077

masek Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Clelow
Clelow
Posts
18
Views
2K
T

Thoughts on this omega seamsater 165.002 please?

timeto Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
T
timeto
Posts
16
Views
2K