Forums Latest Members

Thoughts on this Ed White (pusher experts particularly welcome)

  1. thorec Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    10
    Likes
    13
    Hi all,

    I'd appreciate an evaluation of the piece in the photos. I know there's info out there stating 105.003 pushers should be 4.5mm x 3.5mm (and that given this has an RJ/FJ signed caseback they should be screw-in) and that'll be ascertained in good time. However, I also understand that pushers of those measurements came in different forms/shapes, with different profiles, stems etc. So, by eyeballing it, can any of the experts out there comment on the originality of these?

    Cheers guys
     
    ed white 1.jpg ed white 2.jpg ed white 3.jpg ed white 4.jpg ed white 5.jpg ed white 6.jpg
    murph and Seaborg like this.
  2. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    5,203
    Likes
    23,023
    It is true we see variation in pushers, and can only speculate why there are minute differences in profile. I see nothing about the OP pushers that give me cause for concern.

    Indeed the OP knows more than me if he has connected the case back signature to the screw in/press in characteristic. Kudos! I have not done that!

    [​IMG]
     
    airansun likes this.
  3. Dash1 Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    1,828
    Likes
    3,504
    Imvho those pushers are original vintage ones. Nice watch.
     
  4. kingsrider Thank you Sir! May I have another? Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    2,689
    Likes
    5,431
    Are they fat pushers? as seen on the 105.012-66
     
    nonuffinkbloke likes this.
  5. Dan S Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    18,921
    Likes
    43,464
    One of the most appealing examples I've seen in a while. :thumbsup:
     
  6. n-theory Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    268
    Likes
    565
    Very nice indeed :D
     
  7. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    5,203
    Likes
    23,023
    As to the pushers being short and fat, Well now you mention it....

    Possible the light?

    EDIT: On second look I think they are narrow enough. The lighting really can confuse sometimes on pusher size.
     
    Dash1, Caliber561 and nonuffinkbloke like this.
  8. Basset Hound Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    233
    Likes
    392
    For what it’s worth I think that the pushers look correct. The angle that a photograph is taken from can be deceptive when looking at so many features.
     
    airansun and nonuffinkbloke like this.
  9. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Just buy the damn thing already! Pushers can be sorted without too much heartache.
     
  10. chronoboy64 Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    1,441
    Likes
    11,944
    Great Ed and IMO correct and nicely patinated pushers
     
    thorec likes this.
  11. nonuffinkbloke #1 Nigel Mansell Fan Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    2,145
    Likes
    5,379
    I agree with @Spacefruit and @Basset Hound. I think the edges of the tubes do not appear very well defined in one or two of your photographs, and this makes them appear wider than they actually are.

    The 'fat' tube sides sit much closer to the inside of the pusher rim on my 105.012-65. Also if you compare the height to width ratio on my original 'short fat' pushers, you can see that the pushers and tubes in your pictures look correct for the 105.003 reference.

    20170507_170109-2-1.jpg 20170507_170347-1-2.jpg
     
    Edited Nov 28, 2018
    thorec, Dash1 and gemini4 like this.
  12. boogedyboo Nov 28, 2018

    Posts
    429
    Likes
    908
    It is really hard to discern a difference of 0.05mm from photos but the pushers look correct to me.

    Side note, that is a very nice looking Ed White. Congrats!
     
    airansun likes this.
  13. cholack Nov 29, 2018

    Posts
    207
    Likes
    309
    Agreed
     
  14. thorec Nov 29, 2018

    Posts
    10
    Likes
    13
    Thanks one and all for the opinions and advice. I’ll proceed with alacrity!
     
    Spacefruit and oddboy like this.
  15. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Nov 29, 2018

    Posts
    5,203
    Likes
    23,023
    oh, those were the days:

    Search Results
    Dictionary
    alacrity
    /əˈlakrɪti/
    noun
    noun: alacrity
    brisk and cheerful readiness.
    "she accepted the invitation with alacrity"

    My emphasis, obviously. Wistfully.
     
    thorec and Davidt like this.
  16. airansun In the shuffling madness Nov 29, 2018

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    17,674
    I think the pushers are right.

    Top three photos are from three of my Ed Whites, the bottom two are enlargements of OP’s photos.

    1C8C0363-F27F-43DD-B2EC-D15785947C72.jpeg A4B49AD4-1BE2-4A43-A3B4-55EA77AF67F9.jpeg 25160D2E-B981-4137-BBEA-D827FC7DC0F0.jpeg DF1DDC94-045B-4051-8DBB-01A91BEEA079.jpeg 030E9DA6-690C-4AD8-8A02-BD212612F78B.jpeg
     
    Spacefruit and oddboy like this.