- Posts
- 26
- Likes
- 45
Zohar Melamed
·Hello forum members.
Thank you all for a fantastic though and regularly sobering fountain of knowledge.
I have recently bought these two watches and would like to have a view on what they really are.
the first was sold as seamaster deville ref 135.020 1964 - no photos of the calibre sadly , stainless steel and very sharp lugs. Nice patina on the dial , hands look too good to be original? ( apart from seconds which is a bit rough ) , crown feels off ? lovely to wear - this size is perfect for my small wrists.
The other one feels like a Turkish assembled fake - but I really like the look.
It was advertised as a ref 2893 with a calibre 267
The case is polished to within a mm of it’s little life. Is any of this combo plausible ? The dial has a patinatastic honeycomb vibe - 36mm and feels a bit odd to wear.
looking fwd to be educated on both.
Cheers and nice to meet you
Zohar
Thank you all for a fantastic though and regularly sobering fountain of knowledge.
I have recently bought these two watches and would like to have a view on what they really are.
the first was sold as seamaster deville ref 135.020 1964 - no photos of the calibre sadly , stainless steel and very sharp lugs. Nice patina on the dial , hands look too good to be original? ( apart from seconds which is a bit rough ) , crown feels off ? lovely to wear - this size is perfect for my small wrists.
The other one feels like a Turkish assembled fake - but I really like the look.
It was advertised as a ref 2893 with a calibre 267
The case is polished to within a mm of it’s little life. Is any of this combo plausible ? The dial has a patinatastic honeycomb vibe - 36mm and feels a bit odd to wear.
looking fwd to be educated on both.
Cheers and nice to meet you
Zohar