Forums Latest Members
  1. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 8, 2015

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,722
    Saw this watch on eBay:

    Rare Vintage 1952 Omega Constellation 18K Gold Watch ref. 2648 1st modelPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

    What does the group think of this dial? Original or redial? Case and movement look pretty good to me.

    I realize that there is some degradation, that is expected. Here is original ad:

    [​IMG]

    Here is the eBay watch
    adfa57.JPG

    Not going to buy it, but maybe we can help someone else.

    gatorcpa
     
  2. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Mar 8, 2015

    Posts
    7,387
    Likes
    24,224
    It's the degradation that leads me to believe that it is original. Tough to fake that, and it seems consistent with the wear on the case.
     
  3. cristos71 Mar 8, 2015

    Posts
    7,157
    Likes
    32,938
    I don't like it, the 6 and 12 o clock markers look out of line to me and shouldn't we be seeing double crossed t's on this reference?
     
  4. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 8, 2015

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,791
    The markers are all way off. I find it very hard to believe that Omega would put out a dial that was so inaccurate. No Swiss Made. I am going with redial.

    I like this one (not mine)
    cal. 352 RG-1.jpg
     
  5. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Mar 8, 2015

    Posts
    4,418
    Likes
    11,222
    Maybe early older redial, the minute markers by the 6 o clock hour marker are way off.
     
  6. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 8, 2015

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,791
    Yes. Actually they are all either off or crooked.
     
  7. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Mar 8, 2015

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,836
    Redial. Aside from the fonts being problematic, the minute marker ring is not only misaligned but is should have a smaller circle so that the minute hand tip just touches it. Desmond's watch (as pictured by Steve) demonstrates this.
     
  8. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 8, 2015

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,722
    I was 75% sure it was a redial. I haven't seen enough of this style to post in the "recommended" thread.

    Thanks again,
    gatorcpa