Thoughts on a 105.004-64

Posts

624

Likes

885

Dsplash

·Mar 9, 2025

Hey!
Here is a 105.004-64 I have a very good feeling about but, as I’ll far from an expert on this reference, maybe I’m missing something?
Is it as nice as I think it is? 😁
Thanks! 😀

 

Posts

11,967

Likes

20,807

Davidt

·Mar 9, 2025

At first glance, looks nice and original.

 

Posts

6,787

Likes

21,960

M'Bob

·Mar 9, 2025

Hmmm…my re-dial sensors are on alert for some reason. And the luminous looks touched up in places.

 

Posts

11,967

Likes

20,807

Davidt

·Mar 9, 2025

It’s not the best pictures for assessing the dial but I’m seeing nothing that makes me think it’s not an original dial

 

Posts

624

Likes

885

Dsplash

·Mar 9, 2025

Here are more of the dial

 

Posts

6,787

Likes

21,960

M'Bob

·Mar 9, 2025

I’m going to agree with David: I think the dial is original. But the luminous has very likely been touched up in places.

 

Posts

418

Likes

733

smorrisonmd

·Mar 9, 2025

Looks good to me. And the bracelet is a major bonus.

 

Posts

1,035

Likes

1,635

flqt-9000

·Mar 9, 2025

I would say that even the spring bars are original in this one!

 

Posts

1,035

Likes

1,635

flqt-9000

·Mar 9, 2025

Just for reference, here is mine (that will be for sale as soon I find time to take pics). The dial is different, mine has not the applied indices at 3 and 9.

 

Posts

624

Likes

885

Dsplash

·Mar 9, 2025

Il

flqt-9000

Just for reference, here is mine (that will be for sale as soon I find time to take pics). The dial is different, mine has not the applied indices at 3 and 9.

Very nice one too! 😀
What ref are the bracelet/endlinks?

 

Posts

1,035

Likes

1,635

flqt-9000

·Mar 9, 2025

Dsplash

Il

Very nice one too! 😀
What ref are the bracelet/endlinks?

7912/4 dated 65 and matching with the date on the extract of archive

 

Posts

624

Likes

885

Dsplash

·Mar 9, 2025

This one has a 1035 with #6 endlinks so I guess they were shaved down to 18mm…

More in a few days, I bought it 😁

 

Posts

249

Likes

559

Servius

·Mar 9, 2025

That dial looks really nice, good news we’ll see how it cleans up 🙂

 

N

Posts

56

Likes

29

njlam

·Mar 9, 2025

any idea of the date of manufacture?

 

Posts

1,035

Likes

1,635

flqt-9000

·Mar 9, 2025

If the serial is 22m then 1965

 

N

Posts

56

Likes

29

njlam

·Mar 9, 2025

I am looking for a birth year 1960…what range should the s/n be?

 

Posts

624

Likes

885

Dsplash

·Mar 9, 2025

I would say high 17m serial based on the charts available

 

Posts

266

Likes

1,070

Sharp

·Mar 9, 2025

I'm pretty sure 18mm is correct for No.9 end links so you are good 👍

 

Posts

624

Likes

885

Dsplash

·Mar 9, 2025

Sharp

I'm pretty sure 18mm is correct for No.9 end links so you are good 👍

#9 endlinks? Never heard of these, I just figured someone had shaved down a pair of #6 😅 (I have a set of 516 that suffered this fate…)

 

Posts

1,614

Likes

5,002

Risto

·Mar 10, 2025

Quite interesting that applied metal logo is a bit different than some of these ref have. With some of them the Omega sign feet are angled, some straight. Also, most of these do not have oval "O" in Omega text. But, probably these had both styles used... maybe. Not sure about that crown. Also, the arrow is sometimes more "filled" and another times "feathers" are more separated. What is correct...