That’s a very early date for a -69 is it not? As noted above I would have expected a July 1969 extract date to be on a transitional -68. The 27.71m serial is more usually seen on 68s too, Eugene’s ILMS has it as such. I wonder if the extract date is wrong. Or more likely the movement could have been swapped into a later case, dial etc. That happened too back in the day. Either way there are enough unknowns here to keep me away. I think this is a Franken, part -68, part -69, part modern.
Click to expand...