sgoody1
·This is what the dealer had to say, when I asked him to explain why the condition was so perfect for such old flyers:
The (good!) dealers store them in sealed plastic files almost as soon as they are released and remove them about 5 at a time to place in the store folders. In the case of Star Wars, most dealers picked up hundreds from the theatres knowing they would sell for many years to come. So many were printed that reprints or replicas are totally unnecessary although some may be second run versions from the same or following year. Some reprints exist for rare titles like the Sean Connery 007s and a few others. These were reproduced mainly in the 80s by movie magazines for fans who missed them first time around . They don't have the cinema details usually found at the bottom of the reverse side.
Some sellers in HK and China blow them up to A4 size on colour copiers and sometimes laminate them, but usually clearly state they are reprints.
I am still not convinced - and even the weight of the paper they are printed on seems far too light to have been worthwhile as flyers, as they feel as if they would just crumple immediately when picked up, which a film distributor would not want. I am no expert on Chirashi (having started collecting yesterday), but I do know a bit about paper qualities, and promotion - and there is something not quite right about these.
The newer ones he provided actually do feel a little more substantial, and I think those may be genuine. Either way, its not a big deal, and will look fun in my Rymans folder when I get it, and may actually also put me on the hunt to prove my theory, and try and find a genuine one.
I am pretty sure the episode 4 ones when they arrive will be the same.
The (good!) dealers store them in sealed plastic files almost as soon as they are released and remove them about 5 at a time to place in the store folders. In the case of Star Wars, most dealers picked up hundreds from the theatres knowing they would sell for many years to come. So many were printed that reprints or replicas are totally unnecessary although some may be second run versions from the same or following year. Some reprints exist for rare titles like the Sean Connery 007s and a few others. These were reproduced mainly in the 80s by movie magazines for fans who missed them first time around . They don't have the cinema details usually found at the bottom of the reverse side.
Some sellers in HK and China blow them up to A4 size on colour copiers and sometimes laminate them, but usually clearly state they are reprints.
I am still not convinced - and even the weight of the paper they are printed on seems far too light to have been worthwhile as flyers, as they feel as if they would just crumple immediately when picked up, which a film distributor would not want. I am no expert on Chirashi (having started collecting yesterday), but I do know a bit about paper qualities, and promotion - and there is something not quite right about these.
The newer ones he provided actually do feel a little more substantial, and I think those may be genuine. Either way, its not a big deal, and will look fun in my Rymans folder when I get it, and may actually also put me on the hunt to prove my theory, and try and find a genuine one.
I am pretty sure the episode 4 ones when they arrive will be the same.