The 7077 Bracelet Explained.

Posts
2,315
Likes
5,697
We all know Omega's first generation spring bracelet which was used since 1957 on the early Seamaster 300, Railmaster, & Speedmaster references.
In this post I will try to cover some additional info that is not found in the "Moonwatch Only" book.

There are four types of 7077 bracelet.



Type A (Short buckle/Double spring links):




This first-generation 7077 bracelet has 5 spring links. Two on the front side of the buckle, and tree on the back end of the buckle.
Each side of the bracelet has eight solid links.

First-generation "Short buckle"

*Even though I have seen a couple of 2915-1 Speedmasters that had the earlier split short buckle (bottom). I have yet to see a true 100% "Barn find" 2915-1 on that bracelet, so I cannot say with absolute confidence that these were not fitted to these watches at a later point.


The very early ones (1957/58) were not dated. The buckle dates began in the last part of 1958. (4th quarter).
The Type A 7077 bracelet can be observed until the 4th quarter of 1960 (CK2998-2).

Type B (Short buckle/Non quick remove single spring links):

In the first quarter of 1961 we can observe the first change to the 7077 bracelet.
The double spring links are now gone and replaced by single spring links. Four on the front side of the buckle, and six on the back end of the buckle.
Each side of the bracelet has eight solid links.




Note that these spring links are non "Quick remove" links and require tools to speard open the links in order to remove them and adjust the length of the bracelet (i.e. pain in the ass).



The short buckle still remains on this 2nd generation of the 7077 bracelet.



Type C (Long buckle/Non quick remove single spring links):

During the same first quarter of 1961, yet another change is observed.
The buckle top is now long.




The "Non quick" single spring links remain.
Each side of the bracelet has eight solid links.



Type D (Long buckle/Quick remove single spring links):




During the second quarter of 1961, yet another step in the evolution of the 7077 bracelet.
The "Non-quick remove" single spring links are replaced with the removable spring links which lasted all the way until the end of the flat link bracelet era (1039/1035) in the mid 70's.
Each side of the bracelet has eight solid links.



I hope this post is found helpful to any OF members who might have not been familiar with all of the nuances and steps in the evolution of the 7077 bracelet, and if there is something I missed or got wrong, feel free to add or correct.

And here's just a cool picture to sign off this post

Edited:
 
Posts
5,861
Likes
16,791
Another variety as well. Found mostly on 1950’s Seamasters and Constellations but MWO indicates a maybe for other holy trinity watches.



18K version as well
 
Posts
2,315
Likes
5,697
Another variety as well. Found mostly on 1950’s Seamasters and Constellations but MWO indicates a maybe for other holy trinity watches.

Correct.
I covered the "Split bottom" buckle above. Good to have a picture for reference.

*Even though I have seen a couple of 2915-1 Speedmasters that had the earlier split short buckle (bottom). I have yet to see a true 100% "Barn find" 2915-1 on that bracelet, so I cannot say with absolute confidence that these were not fitted to these watches at a later point.
 
Posts
5,861
Likes
16,791
The very early ones (1957/58) were not dated. The buckle dates began in 1959.

It appears that the dating started in the fourth quarter, 1958.

 
Posts
2,315
Likes
5,697
It appears that the dating started in the fourth quarter, 1958.

Interesting that the date is on the opposite end of where they are usually found.
Also, notice that the SWISS MADE and STEELNOX have switched places between the last quarter of 1958 and the first quarter of 1959.
 
Posts
24,263
Likes
54,031
Many thanks for starting this thread and sharing your observations. This will be a great resource.
 
Posts
5,861
Likes
16,791
Interesting that the date is on the opposite end of where they are usually found.
Also, notice that the SWISS MADE and STEELNOX have switched places between the last quarter of 1958 and the first quarter of 1959.

This 1-59 7077 engraving is aligned the same as the 4-58 example.
 
Posts
7,901
Likes
35,852
Surely when we have a long buckle and single stretch links we have an early version 7912. That's the logic I've always used anyway.

Short clasp and double stretch links = 7077
Short clasp and single stretch links = 7077 transitional
Long clasp and single stretch links no ref = early 7912
 
Posts
970
Likes
4,047
Thank you for your explanations. Very helpful for vintage Seamaster and Speedmaster lovers. 👍
 
Posts
26
Likes
25
V
Thank you for your explanations. Very helpful for vintage Seamaster and Speedmaster lovers. 👍
Very well explained. Thanks!
 
Posts
7,901
Likes
35,852
It appears that the dating started in the fourth quarter, 1958.


Even earlier for the 18kt versions, this one's from the first quarter '58. I'll need to check my others



And just out of interest to show here an 18kt logo which has a lot more detail than the steel version

 
Posts
2,315
Likes
5,697
Surely when we have a long buckle and single stretch links we have an early version 7912. That's the logic I've always used anyway.

Short clasp and double stretch links = 7077
Short clasp and single stretch links = 7077 transitional
Long clasp and single stretch links no ref = early 7912

To me, a 7912 has 7912 stamped on the buckle.
No ref stamped on the buckle = 7077.
 
Posts
4,402
Likes
5,802
Surely when we have a long buckle and single stretch links we have an early version 7912. That's the logic I've always used anyway.

Short clasp and double stretch links = 7077
Short clasp and single stretch links = 7077 transitional
Long clasp and single stretch links no ref = early 7912

thx @cistos71
Was about to post same....
 
Posts
82
Likes
50
Thanks, @ngdal for this great post, awesome stuff!
I think we should highlight these educational posts a little more so they don´t get lost with time. Maybe create a sticky thread with just the links and a content summary of the best educational threads on this forum?
 
Posts
3,554
Likes
7,591
To me, a 7912 has 7912 stamped on the buckle.
No ref stamped on the buckle = 7077.

I don´t think so,

long buckle is 7912, regardless if the reference number is stamped on it or not
 
Posts
2,315
Likes
5,697
I don´t think so,

long buckle is 7912, regardless if the reference number is stamped on it or not
Understood. However, in my opinion a 7912 is only a 7912 when it is stamped on the buckle.
I don’t know of any official word from Omega’s heritage department where they specifically say that the long buckle with no reference stamp is either 7077 or 7912.

I also don’t know of any 2998 with a non ref stamp 7077 long buckle (or as you call it 7912) with an extract that specifies the bracelet reference to be one or the other.

Maybe they are out there, and maybe someone who owns one will see this thread and chime in.
I always love to learn new facts.
 
Posts
7,901
Likes
35,852
Even earlier for the 18kt versions, this one's from the first quarter '58. I'll need to check my others


My other 18kt 7077's are dated 4 57 and 2 60 respectively. I'm curious if anybody has earlier?
 
Posts
5,861
Likes
16,791
I remember a 18k Seamaster with full length 18k 7077 sat and sat on Yahoo Japan for months. Was about $6k USD. Wonderful condition. ::facepalm1::