Swiss Customs Targetting Baselworld Attendees

Posts
2,808
Likes
8,339
I could use a post on here to prove the watches were mine. (Aussie Customs)

And yes as @gatorcpa you can still get a form on Exit in the USA as I checked for a US resident not long ago.

So I traveled to Holland, Denmark and Malaysia with 5 watches and at no time did I have to declare them.
If stopped and questioned I would have explained I was a watch guy and I wear them.

The whole thread is more about the watch journalist and people in the watch industry that were obviously targeted due to past interactions.

For you @larryganz as you mention on the IPC that you are retired it would not be feasible for you to be questioned.

See, I don't even know what IPC means.
 
Posts
16,864
Likes
47,914
But they're personal affects - why would this even be necessary? It's stupid if you ask me. (not you, the rules)

Would have been hard walking in with 4 of your own Rolex watches when there was the stupid One Rolex rule in the US. 馃槈
 
Posts
1,989
Likes
3,566
I'm currently planning a multi-week, multi-country travel this spring for our 40th anniversary. (from the US), Italy will be entry point, and i'm currently planning to exit from Switzerland (hoping to see the Omega museum). We've been to Europe several times, although I've never had watches to worry about. Now i have a small collection i generally take with me (5 watch roll plus what's on my wrist). Some new, some old, total value less than what one Sub is worth. Been reading this thread and the article (several times) and multiple searches on "do i declare my watches when entering Switzerland?". Oh, and my wife does have jewelry and "some" purses and shoes with significant value.

it's not clear, and as a visitor i DO want to understand and follow the rules of the land, it pi$$es me off endlessly when people act as if the rules apply to someone else. BUT, I'm not sure i understand. so, it looks like I have two choices

a. Skip Switzerland; exit from Paris (an entirely acceptable option)
b. Don't take the watches and buy ONE watch from the "good GMT <$2K" thread (I'm strongly considering this option). Technically i guess i'd have to declare this one as well, but at least it's on my wrist and clearly for personal use. I may also buy a watch while on the trip, but i fully understand the VAT process and declaring when returning to the US. Presumably when entering Switzerland with said purchase, it would be in a box and i'd have all the paperwork, so no major issues there.

it's interesting that any country desiring the tourist money, makes it difficult for the traveler to understand their rules. I get the whole "personal property" concept, and the discussion about declaring multiple watches (OK, "most" people only have one or two) seems almost as silly as declaring the 6 or so pairs of boxer shorts i'll also take with me.

go to Southampton and take the Queen Mary to New York instead of flying home
 
Posts
212
Likes
1,883
go to Southampton and take the Queen Mary to New York instead of flying home

that would be quite tempting if I had both the extra time and money for such a venture. Maybe "next" time 馃憤
 
Posts
7,719
Likes
14,269
The last time I came into the Ft Lauderdale cruiseport (last year) you didn't even fill out the Customs form, show your passport and walk on in. No declaration asked for. I've travelled internationally for 40 years, usually with more than one watch, often a dozen or more if relocating. Zero problems. I think the original issue of the journalist was caused by an overzealous Swiss customs officer and once the system started grinding it was going to do its damage. An isolated event. I see no need to change the way I travel. Everyone needs to do what makes them comfortable.