Archer
··Omega Qualified WatchmakerYou have no conception the pressure that those in trade will bring to bear on those in academia, and how ill prepared the academics are for the attention of these (at times) Machiavellian traders who realize that putting in a bit of pressure will transform their profit.
The only reason the "Machiavellian traders" would think putting pressure on could improve their fortunes is if they know doing so actually works to get an extract changed somehow in their favour. The easy solution to that is not do what they are asking the archive staff to do. Once people realize they can't pressure people into such changes, the pressure should naturally recede.
The fact that there is "pressure" is in no way an explanation for the things people are questioning, and giving in to that pressure raises more questions than it answers. How is the Omega archive or the people who run it benefitting with the relationship with these "Machiavellian traders" and auctions houses? Is there some kind of quid pro quo going on here that the rest of us are not aware of? If so, that makes the whole thing even more shady in my view.
I don't think anyone is out to crucify the people at Omega who make these extracts, but legitimate questions have been raised about the validity of the process, and if pressure is coming from anywhere it should be the collectors here that rely on those extracts. There are some here who have extraordinary access to these people and could raise these concerns with them, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of appetite for that from what I've seen.
Too bad there really isn't any proper watch journalism, because this is the kind of thing a proper investigative journalist could dig into, but since everyone currently involved seems to have something to loose, answers will not be forthcoming I expect.