Forums Latest Members
  1. Fallout Boy Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    1,804
    Likes
    3,971
  2. Davidt Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    10,423
    Likes
    18,128
    It’s a -69 Speedmaster with the misprinted ‘220’ bezel.

    I can’t make out the serial to check it’s correct for this bezel, but everything else looks correct. Case is fairly good, bezel not so much.
     
    Mark020, gemini4 and Fallout Boy like this.
  3. Fallout Boy Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    1,804
    Likes
    3,971
    case fairly good means.....? Can you see any polishing ??? I am more in to Seamaster..
     
  4. Davidt Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    10,423
    Likes
    18,128
    Not sure why but I cannot zoom in on those pictures to see detail. From what I can see the case looks ok but I do think it’s been polished, albeit to a decent standard.
    Again, I can’t zoom in on the pictures to confirm.

    Perhaps you could repost all the pictures here?
     
  5. Fallout Boy Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    1,804
    Likes
    3,971
    speedy2.jpg

    Is this "structure" original? Grinding? Must this side be polished or not? IMO my SM 300 -case is similar
     
  6. Fallout Boy Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    1,804
    Likes
    3,971
    another picture

    speedy3.jpg
     
  7. Davidt Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    10,423
    Likes
    18,128
    I’ll stick with my original thoughts. The case is nice and thick and has the correct lines but it is slightly softer than an unpolished example so has certainly been polished.
    Obviously this is what you’d expect to see on a 50 year old watch. Unpolished examples are the exception not the norm.
     
    Mark020 and Fallout Boy like this.
  8. Dan S Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    18,821
    Likes
    43,266
    Dial and hands look quite nice. Case is ok. The problem is the bezel, it's really too far gone.
     
    perenowell, MikiJ and Fallout Boy like this.
  9. Fallout Boy Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    1,804
    Likes
    3,971
    Such a bezel is never a concern for me on my watches, they tell a story ;)
     
  10. daderaz Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    203
    Likes
    306
    Bezel is not in good condition for collectors, but photographs magnify the flaws. I think it could be nice on the wrist.
     
    Fallout Boy likes this.
  11. jantjewgm Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    475
    Likes
    1,206
    Case looks good to me, dial and hands as well. I would look for a bezel to replace this one.
     
    Fallout Boy likes this.
  12. pmontoyap Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    482
    Likes
    938
    Finding a decent 220 bezel should prove to be a difficult task. Other than that, I like the watch
     
    Fallout Boy likes this.
  13. Barking mad Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jan 1, 2022

    Posts
    4,541
    Likes
    64,605
    This is one of mine. From what I can make out of the serial of the watch in question it looks to be in the range.
    IMG_0140.jpeg
     
    Dr No, whyboddau and Fallout Boy like this.
  14. MikiJ Likes songs about Purple spices Jan 2, 2022

    Posts
    2,843
    Likes
    2,386
    Tell me about it as I've been looking for a decent one for over a year now. One is currently available from a reputable seller for a reduced price.
    The price is reduced because it needs a new crystal and and complete set of new hands. All of which are available but the case back looks as though it was used as a shield in a sword fight. At the end of the day, the severly damaged case back nixed the deal for me :(
     
  15. daderaz Jan 2, 2022

    Posts
    203
    Likes
    306
    This is mine
    99DBE1DD-6D79-44C9-B49F-EF82E31DE306.jpeg
     
    Dr No, whyboddau and Fallout Boy like this.
  16. Fallout Boy Jan 2, 2022

    Posts
    1,804
    Likes
    3,971
    both watches : lovely patina :thumbsup:
     
  17. perenowell Jan 2, 2022

    Posts
    549
    Likes
    1,106
    The pushers look like to be too much in the mid case, too small. It seems weird on these pictures…
    The bezel is not in a perfect condition but the dial and the hands look great.
    Be careful about the serial too.

    here’s mine.
    3A6C204A-F58E-41FC-B45F-38D28D565056.jpeg
     
    Fallout Boy, Dr No and whyboddau like this.
  18. Matth84 Jan 6, 2022

    Posts
    151
    Likes
    74
    For your comparison, this is my Speedmaster Prof. 145.022-69 "220"

    B57CD7C5-D440-4032-9A88-DA9ADC8C3D0F.jpeg
     
    Fallout Boy, Dr No and perenowell like this.
  19. perenowell Jan 6, 2022

    Posts
    549
    Likes
    1,106
    Nice one!
     
  20. Matth84 Jan 6, 2022

    Posts
    151
    Likes
    74
    Thanks! Especially the bezel and dial are in topcondition. The movementnumber is correct for a “220”.