Speedy 145.022-69 -"misprint" :

Posts

3,136

Likes

6,517

Fallout Boy

·Jan 1, 2022

Hi @ all and Happy New Year,

can the specialists here please tell me more about this offered watch at C24? What do you recognize at this speedy. Any information appreciated.
atb Jo

https://www.chrono24.de/omega/omega...ge-prof-moonwatch-tritium-rare--id7634825.htm

 

Posts

13,510

Likes

23,445

Davidt

·Jan 1, 2022

It’s a -69 Speedmaster with the misprinted ‘220’ bezel.

I can’t make out the serial to check it’s correct for this bezel, but everything else looks correct. Case is fairly good, bezel not so much.

 

Posts

3,136

Likes

6,517

Fallout Boy

·Jan 1, 2022

case fairly good means.....? Can you see any polishing ??? I am more in to Seamaster..

 

Posts

13,510

Likes

23,445

Davidt

·Jan 1, 2022

Not sure why but I cannot zoom in on those pictures to see detail. From what I can see the case looks ok but I do think it’s been polished, albeit to a decent standard.
Again, I can’t zoom in on the pictures to confirm.

Perhaps you could repost all the pictures here?

 

Posts

3,136

Likes

6,517

Fallout Boy

·Jan 1, 2022

Is this "structure" original? Grinding? Must this side be polished or not? IMO my SM 300 -case is similar

 

Posts

3,136

Likes

6,517

Fallout Boy

·Jan 1, 2022

another picture

 

Posts

13,510

Likes

23,445

Davidt

·Jan 1, 2022

I’ll stick with my original thoughts. The case is nice and thick and has the correct lines but it is slightly softer than an unpolished example so has certainly been polished.
Obviously this is what you’d expect to see on a 50 year old watch. Unpolished examples are the exception not the norm.

 

Posts

24,792

Likes

55,067

Dan S

·Jan 1, 2022

Dial and hands look quite nice. Case is ok. The problem is the bezel, it's really too far gone.

 

Posts

3,136

Likes

6,517

Fallout Boy

·Jan 1, 2022

Such a bezel is never a concern for me on my watches, they tell a story 😉

 

Posts

204

Likes

322

daderaz

·Jan 1, 2022

Bezel is not in good condition for collectors, but photographs magnify the flaws. I think it could be nice on the wrist.

 

Posts

659

Likes

1,631

jantjewgm

·Jan 1, 2022

Case looks good to me, dial and hands as well. I would look for a bezel to replace this one.

 

Posts

500

Likes

966

pmontoyap

·Jan 1, 2022

Finding a decent 220 bezel should prove to be a difficult task. Other than that, I like the watch

 

Posts

5,417

Likes

81,767

Barking mad

·Jan 1, 2022·Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder

This is one of mine. From what I can make out of the serial of the watch in question it looks to be in the range.

 

Posts

2,844

Likes

2,440

MikiJ

·Jan 2, 2022

pmontoyap

Finding a decent 220 bezel should prove to be a difficult task. Other than that, I like the watch

Tell me about it as I've been looking for a decent one for over a year now. One is currently available from a reputable seller for a reduced price.
The price is reduced because it needs a new crystal and and complete set of new hands. All of which are available but the case back looks as though it was used as a shield in a sword fight. At the end of the day, the severly damaged case back nixed the deal for me 🙁

 

Posts

204

Likes

322

daderaz

·Jan 2, 2022

This is mine

 

Posts

3,136

Likes

6,517

Fallout Boy

·Jan 2, 2022

both watches : lovely patina 👍

 

Posts

656

Likes

1,237

perenowell

·Jan 2, 2022

The pushers look like to be too much in the mid case, too small. It seems weird on these pictures…
The bezel is not in a perfect condition but the dial and the hands look great.
Be careful about the serial too.

here’s mine.

 

Posts

153

Likes

75

Matth84

·Jan 6, 2022

For your comparison, this is my Speedmaster Prof. 145.022-69 "220"

 

Posts

656

Likes

1,237

perenowell

·Jan 6, 2022

Nice one!

 

Posts

153

Likes

75

Matth84

·Jan 6, 2022

perenowell

Nice one!

Thanks! Especially the bezel and dial are in topcondition. The movementnumber is correct for a “220”.