Spacefruit
··Prolific Speedmaster HoarderI like Antiquorum. They have the largest numbers of watches on offer, and it is a little more wild west that the three other auctioneers. They get some flack for having watches with issues, but it also means we see many more watches, some with serious issues, and sometime a bargain when others are fearful to bid. Only three vintage Speedmasters this time, they often have more. Estimates looked low, so its worth digging in. An Ed White for $5575? Read on.
Lot 140 - 105.012-66
Estimate: $3,800–7,500 - Sold for $6,210
Was it cheap? At first glance, yes - I just saw one with a friend who paid $17,000 for the same reference - but on examination it was a much better example. This watch clearly shows the facet lines on the lugs.
Looking at the single image provided, I suspect the pushers are thin-neck replacements. It’s hard to confirm from the angle, but if so, I would downgrade the value by at least $2,000.
Again, the photo resolution doesn’t help, but the dial markers are clearly missing luminous material. Where lume remains, it’s dirty and uneven - a major downgrade in value.
I’d also want to check the bezel under a loupe, as the resolution doesn’t allow a proper look at the fonts. Although the bezel is damaged and marked, this no longer guarantees originality - counterfeit bezels have been circulating long enough to acquire a genuine-looking patina. I don’t think this one is likely a counterfeit, but I would want to confirm in hand.
I think the price was influenced by the pushers and the markers.
Lot 141 - 145.0012
Estimate: $2,500–5,000 - Sold for $5,575
Hard to see the value here - it’s a service watch fitted with a vintage serial-numbered movement. The dial, hands, bezel, case, and bracelet have all been replaced, leaving little to attract the collector. The service case if undamaged, might be worth $1000 or less, and the movement $2500 max so its hard to see what is going on here,
Lot 142 - 105.003
Estimate: $3,800–5,400 - Sold for $5,575
At first sight this appears to be another service watch, but in fact there’s some value here. It has a straight-lug case with a certified movement and a vintage 1035 bracelet. Three years ago, we might have valued the movement at $3,000, the case at $2,000, and the bracelet at $1,500 - though today those figures may be optimistic. That said, I sense a firming of demand for Speedmasters and their parts, so perhaps this result signals that trend.
Lot 145 - “145.22-67” (sic)
Estimate: $4,700–9,400 - Unsold
The auctioneer made an error in the reference. Based on the calibre 321 in the description, it must be a 145.012, which fits the given serial.
Why didn’t it sell? First, the dial: the markers are flaky and inconsistent. The hands are poor, with much of the paint missing from the minute hand, and the chronograph seconds hand looks rough in the lume.
What I’d be examining closely is that pulsations bezel. A batch of reproductions appeared a few years ago, and they’re very hard to distinguish. The repros had the correct dividing line and are nearly impossible to tell apart unless viewed together, in the metal. The red flag here is the perfect carrier ring on a watch that clearly shows wear. On the other hand, the damage and patina near the “E” look genuinely old - leaning toward originality.
This watch highlights why viewing in person matters. In any case, I didn’t find it an especially interesting piece to buy.
Lot 140 - 105.012-66
Estimate: $3,800–7,500 - Sold for $6,210
Was it cheap? At first glance, yes - I just saw one with a friend who paid $17,000 for the same reference - but on examination it was a much better example. This watch clearly shows the facet lines on the lugs.
Looking at the single image provided, I suspect the pushers are thin-neck replacements. It’s hard to confirm from the angle, but if so, I would downgrade the value by at least $2,000.
Again, the photo resolution doesn’t help, but the dial markers are clearly missing luminous material. Where lume remains, it’s dirty and uneven - a major downgrade in value.
I’d also want to check the bezel under a loupe, as the resolution doesn’t allow a proper look at the fonts. Although the bezel is damaged and marked, this no longer guarantees originality - counterfeit bezels have been circulating long enough to acquire a genuine-looking patina. I don’t think this one is likely a counterfeit, but I would want to confirm in hand.
I think the price was influenced by the pushers and the markers.
Lot 141 - 145.0012
Estimate: $2,500–5,000 - Sold for $5,575
Hard to see the value here - it’s a service watch fitted with a vintage serial-numbered movement. The dial, hands, bezel, case, and bracelet have all been replaced, leaving little to attract the collector. The service case if undamaged, might be worth $1000 or less, and the movement $2500 max so its hard to see what is going on here,
Lot 142 - 105.003
Estimate: $3,800–5,400 - Sold for $5,575
At first sight this appears to be another service watch, but in fact there’s some value here. It has a straight-lug case with a certified movement and a vintage 1035 bracelet. Three years ago, we might have valued the movement at $3,000, the case at $2,000, and the bracelet at $1,500 - though today those figures may be optimistic. That said, I sense a firming of demand for Speedmasters and their parts, so perhaps this result signals that trend.
Lot 145 - “145.22-67” (sic)
Estimate: $4,700–9,400 - Unsold
The auctioneer made an error in the reference. Based on the calibre 321 in the description, it must be a 145.012, which fits the given serial.
Why didn’t it sell? First, the dial: the markers are flaky and inconsistent. The hands are poor, with much of the paint missing from the minute hand, and the chronograph seconds hand looks rough in the lume.
What I’d be examining closely is that pulsations bezel. A batch of reproductions appeared a few years ago, and they’re very hard to distinguish. The repros had the correct dividing line and are nearly impossible to tell apart unless viewed together, in the metal. The red flag here is the perfect carrier ring on a watch that clearly shows wear. On the other hand, the damage and patina near the “E” look genuinely old - leaning toward originality.
This watch highlights why viewing in person matters. In any case, I didn’t find it an especially interesting piece to buy.





