At first I thought it was 3592.50 which has 863 movement and same caseback, but the dial isn't the same as a 3592.50 Also 345.0808 had similar case back.
That dial is very, very odd. It looks sort of like a BA145.022-69 dial but it has Ts on the bottom not OM, and more significantly it looks too small to fit in the Moonwatch case, like it was meant for something smaller than that. Then the movement and case is a weird combination too, that I could just say is a parts assembly but what is that dial and hand set and were is it from???
Get the Heritage department , was a standard speed from 1981 delivered to Lebanon , the guy told me his father change the dial and case back and bezel. Y the gold ones, all explain now, this dial still a misterious thing.
At first I thought it was 3592.50 which has 863 movement and same caseback, but the dial isn't the same as a 3592.50 Also 345.0808 had similar case back.
While I’m not an expert on this matter, all I can say is that this watch is definitely not a 3592.50. Thank you for sharing the photo.
Get the Heritage department , was a standard speed from 1981 delivered to Lebanon , the guy told me his father change the dial and case back and bezel. Y the gold ones, all explain now, this dial still a misterious thing.
Yea I just dont know where you could even get that dial from it has to be off something, but its not a 69, its not a Teutonic, it doesnt have tritium in spite of having Ts on it, its a very odd duck indeed.