Does this look correct? Supposed to be a 105.003 - 64. I think the Ts are too far apart. Hands look too nice also. Thank you for your guidance. Tony
Wide spaced T and short indices. Speedmaster101 claims that's wrong but also hints that it might be correct or a service dial and needs more research. Broadly I believe both of those features are considered wrong on that reference.
Completely wrong. It's a short indicies, painted logo, no step, professional dial. It's hard to give a value from one picture but whether it's 'running' or 'good' on the chart you'll need to deduct a few k for the price of sourcing a correct dial.