Forums Latest Members
  1. Scubasteve May 14, 2020

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    0
    Has Omega ever made a display back Speedmaster that is less than 42mm? I've only seen a 44.5mm coax but would ideally like to see a speedmaster racing or reduced with a display back.
     
  2. Dale Vito May 14, 2020

    Posts
    56
    Likes
    260
    The Speedmaster '57, coming in at 41.5mm, is the only one that comes to mind; reference 33112425101002 (et cetera).
     
    padders likes this.
  3. Canuck May 14, 2020

    Posts
    13,478
    Likes
    38,026
    This display back from 1980 is 42 mm.

    D594D0A3-2D5E-4D21-BD30-B515513FF32C.jpeg 79001F6A-3D13-41C1-BBD4-F818392A21E1.jpeg
     
    Dsloan likes this.
  4. Scubasteve May 14, 2020

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    0
    Wow! That is be-A-utiful! Thanks for sharing the pic.
     
  5. kov Trüffelschwein. May 14, 2020

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    In fact, the first 42mm stainless steel moonwatch with a display case back was indeed a 345.0808 but with a copper calibre 863 (not gilt like yours), produced in 1985-86, and def not in 1980. Here's how the first iteration of the 345.0808 looks like :

    upload_2020-5-14_18-12-45.jpeg
    upload_2020-5-14_18-13-27.jpeg
     
    Edited May 14, 2020
  6. Canuck May 14, 2020

    Posts
    13,478
    Likes
    38,026
    @kov , perhaps you can explain this to me? It clearly seems to indicate 1980!

    0684E405-9DA7-4F21-BDEE-BC7174C21534.jpeg
     
  7. kov Trüffelschwein. May 14, 2020

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    If you mind sharing where does this table come from...? Is it a trusted / verified source? :)
     
  8. kov Trüffelschwein. May 14, 2020

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    @Canuck This is what a trusted source says on this topic.

    AFDA914B-E3A4-4D8C-9388-6823576C44AC.jpeg

    First = Copper. Yours comes later. As I wrote above, 1989-90 is my guess. ;)
     
    befobe likes this.
  9. Canuck May 14, 2020

    Posts
    13,478
    Likes
    38,026
    It came from here. I think you might agree it is a “trusted source”? Comments? I ordered mine in 1991, and it came about 3 weeks later.

    http://chronomaddox.com/omega/tables/mr/speedy_history_cm.html

    According to this listing, 345.0809 (a moon phase version) came in 1985, with an 869 movement.
     
    Edited May 14, 2020
  10. kov Trüffelschwein. May 14, 2020

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    I know that table as much as I know that website... Unfortunately I can't agree.

    There is a number of mismatches in Maddox's research. Numerous things have been further researched by people like Davidoffs and/or MoonwatchOnly authors with the precious help of the Omega archives and the outcome of their research differs from what used to be the truth by Maddox.

    To make it short, Maddox's research is a rough estimation. If you want to be more accurate you need to use other sources nowadays. Sorry ;)

    And you didn't get a watch from 1980 :thumbsup:
     
    Archer and valkyrie_rider like this.
  11. kov Trüffelschwein. May 14, 2020

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    Why do you mention the 345.0809 now? It's the SpeedyMoon :) a totally different watch, with no display caseback.
    Indeed, it came out in the mid eighties as well but with the calibre 866, not 869, anyway this is not relevant to the topic we discuss here.
     
  12. Canuck May 14, 2020

    Posts
    13,478
    Likes
    38,026
    The header on that site states “Compiled & copyright my Marco Richon, Omega Watch Co, Switzerland”. So many experts! Sigh! And precisely where, pray tell, did I say that I bought a 1980 watch in 1990? Huh? I ordered it, brand new, at an AD in 1990, and it took three weeks For the watch to arrive. Put your glasses on!
     
  13. kov Trüffelschwein. May 14, 2020

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    RIP Richon made a tremendous work to put together A Journey Through Time book but here as well, a lot of information has been proven wrong or incomplete since that huge book was published.

    I am happy to see the passion pushing more people to research as well as the brand to open doors and collaborate with « externals ». It would have been sad for the community if nobody continued Richon’s work after he passed away.
     
  14. padders Oooo subtitles! May 14, 2020

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Seaborg likes this.
  15. befobe May 14, 2020

    Posts
    1,312
    Likes
    7,876
    @Canuck A little bit confusing your last posts, about speedymoon, about your first pic making a link (wrong) between a 1980 watch purchased in 1990.
    Kov explained everything clearly. There are times "before" MoonwatchOnly, and times "after".
    This huge work has corrected a lot of mistakes. But these mistakes keep on circulate nowadays, even through "experts" (example: the "so called" 2000 units limited edition speedmaster 125)
    To summerize: you can trust MWO...
     
  16. Canuck May 14, 2020

    Posts
    13,478
    Likes
    38,026
    You’re confused! Are you doubting that my sapphire back Speedmaster was bought in 1990? As many opinions as there might be to the provenance of this watch, mine is the only valid one. I bought it from an AD. They placed the order with the sales rep, and I waited about 3 weeks for delivery. I am the first and only owner, and it has not been altered, (or even worn much, either). It is hard to know which “expert” is the correct one.
     
  17. padders Oooo subtitles! May 14, 2020

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    You must admit that your posts in this thread are a little confusing.
     
    Edited May 14, 2020
  18. befobe May 15, 2020

    Posts
    1,312
    Likes
    7,876
    Okay... I think I should give up. It is maybe my poor english level, but I definitely don't understand Canuck...
    Anyway, the original question of Scubasteve was about smaller display backs, there is one answer, and like Dale Vito, I don't know reduced speed ref with display back... Other optinions?
     
  19. padders Oooo subtitles! May 15, 2020

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Part of the reason you don’t see Reduced models with display backs (even aftermarket ones) is that there isn’t a particularly nice view under the back. All the chrono components which make for an interesting view are out of sight in a compound movement and the 3 hander part, which looks similar to the ETA 2892 isn’t decorated all that elaborately. The 7750 derived movements in the Auto, Day-Date and Mk40 look more interesting (if a little agricultural) but are still nowhere near as ornate as the 861 family. Omega did see fit to provide some of the Broad Arrow models which used the 33X3 movements with display backs as those received rather more decoration than the other autos mentioned here. There were also smaller 35-37mm Speedmaster and Deville models using these latter 33X3 auto movements but those were marketed at women.
     
    Edited May 15, 2020
    befobe and kov like this.