Speedmaster Dial critique...

Posts
4
Likes
6
I've got a new 311.30.42.30.01.005 from a trusted seller here, and the concentric rings are either not there or so faint that I think I might see them under a loupe but then again maybe not depending on the lighting angle. So there must be some variance between productions, as mine is nowhere near as prominent as it is on some others that I've seen.
 
Posts
223
Likes
303
Beautiful thing, my question is what sort of money are we talking about with such a nice looking watch if all is well with it in to days market. PM if apropriate.

Thanks,
M
 
Posts
1,849
Likes
3,575
And we want to know - did you buy it?? I certainly hope so.
 
Posts
248
Likes
50
I've got a new 311.30.42.30.01.005 from a trusted seller here, and the concentric rings are either not there or so faint that I think I might see them under a loupe but then again maybe not depending on the lighting angle. So there must be some variance between productions, as mine is nowhere near as prominent as it is on some others that I've seen.
Weirdly I was also looking for the concentric rings but no such luck. I have a new sapphire. Maybe a glimmer in certain light but not sure. Looking at the video omega has on YouTube that one clearly doesn’t. It interesting to say the least. Anybody else noticed absent rings on very recent models?
 
Posts
2,145
Likes
5,634
Sub dials - no signs of any concentric rings, maybe not enough detail in the photo.....

I think your photograph should be sharp enough to see them when expanded, without a loupe ??? Having said that I have photographs of my watch, in which they are not easily visible.😕 maybe it depends on the light???
Edited:
 
Posts
248
Likes
50
I looked at mine with 10x loupe. Very hard to see any slight circle. Interesting omega changed this. One hidden detail that’s now gone.