I think I can see the faint outline of the serial on the caseback where it usually is on late Reduced models, have you had the watch in hand? It may actually be present.
You are absolutely correct. Just got a better picture where s/n is visible.
The problem is, I don't have the watch in hand as at the moment it's impossible to meet with the seller in person as we live quite a long distance from each other, however I'm planning a trip with one stop to inspect the watch.
Just got confirmation that the s/n that is on the back is also the same in corresponding documentation.
I'm unable to verify what service was done a few years ago.
I'm also unable to say why the chrono hand is not aligned correctly to 12 o'clock position.
I assume (possibly wrongly), that it's only the case of proper alignment of the hand, not that there's a significant problem with the chrono movement itself.
Who did the last service, have you seen proof?
Proof in a form of a receipt with s/n and short remark - full service done on particular date.
If you think the asking price is fair after adding in a chunk for a fix or maybe service then it may still be a good buy, but I suspect it is not.
It's not easy call to make. The price is fair though, I can't afford full size speedmaster, hence reduced one seem to me like a good alternative. Although I still have to inspect it. According to s/n decoder website, it says that the speedmaster was made in 1999. Forgive me for my lack of knowledge on this matter, but could you or someone else correct me if I'm wrong thinking that the movement was firstly released in 1999?
Also, I spotted on ebay similar
issue with the chrono hand on auction id 165934252876. It seems that it's not isolated problem, isn't it?