Forums Latest Members
  1. HairspringHarry Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    88
    Likes
    15
    Hi there guys
    I've been offered a Speedy and the seller has been very honest in saying that there are clearly features of the watch that don't match so here's the specs.

    Ref 145.022 71 ST
    Cal 861

    Serial dates it to 1968 (26 million) but it has the moon landing case back which is obviously not right as this only happened in 1969.

    The bezel is not DON which I believe also makes this later than the serial number suggests.

    Is it possible they fitted this watch with an 861 they had in stock for a couple of years?

    I'm no Speedy expert so any help would be massively appreciated!

    The case back is off Google as I forgot to photograph the actual one

    Thanks in advance

    HH
     
    20200313_145152.jpg 20200313_144138.jpg 20200313_143953.jpg Screenshot_20200313-185417_Chrome~2.jpg
    Edited Mar 13, 2020
  2. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,016
    Its a Frank
     
  3. OMEGuy Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    There are two movement pics and one caseback pic that don't match... :whistling:
     
  4. padders Oooo subtitles! Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Nasty put together using parts from at least 3 different eras. Hands are just plain wrong. Don't go there unless it is as cheap as the parts alone. Having said that, your photos show 3 different watches, one not even a Speedmaster so who knows!
     
  5. HairspringHarry Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    88
    Likes
    15
    Oops ignore the second movement pic, my mistake.

    I think I will just avoid this one then, judging from the response.

    Cheers guys
    HH
     
  6. padders Oooo subtitles! Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Even ignoring the non Omega chrono stray photo, there are still 2 different Speedmasters shown there, look at the end link numbers.
     
    airansun likes this.
  7. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    17,105
    Likes
    25,350
    Wrong more modern dial, wrong hands from a mkII?

    decent DNN bezel, early 861 movement.
     
  8. HairspringHarry Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    88
    Likes
    15
    Yeah I was a bit rushed so forgot to take a pic of the actual case back but the last pic is off Google just to show what the case back looked like.
     
  9. padders Oooo subtitles! Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    I have just realised, that first monstrosity you show actually has a very polished straight lug case, presumably a 105.003-6X, very little there in fact has any relation to a 145.022-71, certainly not the case, dial, hands, movement.
     
  10. HairspringHarry Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    88
    Likes
    15
    So I could it be the case back is wrong and it's actually a completely different reference?
     
  11. OMEGuy Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    The OP has deleted pictures?
     
  12. padders Oooo subtitles! Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    No 1960s straight lug came with a 861 movement. That is a horrible thrown together parts draw watch, it is possible no 2 parts match. You say you are no Speedy expert, I tend to agree. These are fundamentals, go to school on these before you make an expensive mistake!

    https://speedmaster101.com
     
  13. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    17,105
    Likes
    25,350
    Damn missed that too lol. In everyone’s defense the only shot that really shows the chrono pushers is from another watch with crown guards.
     
  14. mr_yossarian Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    2,418
    Likes
    4,572
    The most scary things for me, Year to date:
    1. Corona
    2. This Watch
     
  15. HairspringHarry Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    88
    Likes
    15
    I accidentally added a random pic which I removed
     
    Spacefruit likes this.
  16. lpestre Mar 13, 2020

    Posts
    93
    Likes
    33
    This watch should be number 1 !