Tom Dick
·evening all
I posted some thoughts on this a couple of days ago tacked on to another thread but thought it might warrant a seperate stand alone thread.
So..... I while back my beloved 105.003-64 came back to me, although I've owned a dozen or more Ed Whites this one just gelled with me and was so original and unspoiled when I was offered the opportunity to get it back I broke my humble overdraft and jumped (much to Mrs Dicks unhappiness)
The watch is completely original and although the case had perhaps had the lightest of refinishes it was pretty much original, which presented a dilemma as the case looked untouched and had lost no meat but had no facets on the case edge
This is where my research gene kicked in, I looked at ever image of the 64 and all had the same feature as mine, no facets and sharp lug definition between the lug top and sides.
So I have come to the conclusion that the 105.003-64 is a one year only case design. I do not know the why but all the 64's I've found (except those that have been over finished and had facets added in) have a very definite lack of facet edges.
When comparing a 64 side by side against a 2998-105003-63 or a 105.003-65 they have a very different profile
This is my own 105.003-64, it's just back from STS where Simon has given it the very lightest of hand refinishes.
I'd welcome people feedback and any images of fellow 64 owners watches for comparison. I could be completely wrong and would welcome challenge on this but the research I've done leads to one conclusion that for 1964 omega introduced a case design for a single year then for the 65 reverted back to the faceted case/ lug edge
I posted some thoughts on this a couple of days ago tacked on to another thread but thought it might warrant a seperate stand alone thread.
So..... I while back my beloved 105.003-64 came back to me, although I've owned a dozen or more Ed Whites this one just gelled with me and was so original and unspoiled when I was offered the opportunity to get it back I broke my humble overdraft and jumped (much to Mrs Dicks unhappiness)
The watch is completely original and although the case had perhaps had the lightest of refinishes it was pretty much original, which presented a dilemma as the case looked untouched and had lost no meat but had no facets on the case edge
This is where my research gene kicked in, I looked at ever image of the 64 and all had the same feature as mine, no facets and sharp lug definition between the lug top and sides.
So I have come to the conclusion that the 105.003-64 is a one year only case design. I do not know the why but all the 64's I've found (except those that have been over finished and had facets added in) have a very definite lack of facet edges.
When comparing a 64 side by side against a 2998-105003-63 or a 105.003-65 they have a very different profile
This is my own 105.003-64, it's just back from STS where Simon has given it the very lightest of hand refinishes.
I'd welcome people feedback and any images of fellow 64 owners watches for comparison. I could be completely wrong and would welcome challenge on this but the research I've done leads to one conclusion that for 1964 omega introduced a case design for a single year then for the 65 reverted back to the faceted case/ lug edge
Edited: