*Solved* Help find Ref/Model on this *1928 Omega Tonneau

Posts
91
Likes
207
Hello all,

Just purchased this piece and would love to find out more about it. Does anyone have an old advert or catalogue where it's referenced? Any kind of info would be appreciated - I've only found that it might be dated to around 1937. The watch hasn't yet arrived so I don't have photos of the movement, but I believe it's a cal. 26.5 .. I can confirm later. The case is sterling silver and measures ~ 30mm x 40mm

Here are some photos:
(Possibly the same watch, this one was on sale in ~2014)
tumblr_pllfeealDJ1tk4f1vo1_1280.jpg
(Actual watch I bought)
$_57.JPG

Many thanks for your time!
 
Posts
3,370
Likes
7,214
The watch case seems to be authentic (except the crown) but the dials on both watches are bad re-prints.
Photos could show the same watch... 馃槙
Edited:
 
Posts
91
Likes
207
The watch case seems to be authentic but the dials on both watches are bad re-prints

Well, I don't know I'd call it "bad" besides the logo now that you point it out.. but I guess I had overlooked that. Could you estimate an approximate valuation?

I suppose I should start looking for an original dial but I imagine it may be hard to find..

Thank you
 
Posts
4,876
Likes
14,742
It鈥檚 handsome, I see why you like it 馃憤
 
Posts
3,370
Likes
7,214
I've only found that it might be dated to around 1937. The watch hasn't yet arrived so I don't have photos of the movement, but I believe it's a cal. 26.5

The movement should not be a cal. 26.5 but a gold plated cal. 13麓麓麓
Looks like this:




Case model# (ref.#) is 592.13
the watch is much older than you expect. - It is around 1915
Edited:
 
Posts
91
Likes
207
The movement should not be a cal. 26.5 but a gold plated cal. 13麓麓麓
Looks like this:




Case model# (ref.#) is 592.13
the watch is much older than you expect. - It is around 1915

Fantastic, thank you for this info and the photo, Mac. I'll need to double check the movement once it arrives - my cal. 26.5 assumption was based on a similar but different model.

I still hope to see an original dial or catalogue/advert photo if you or anyone else reading has their hands on either.
 
Posts
3,469
Likes
7,970
Tonneau case with hinged "securitas" lug is an easy search, here is what AJTT shows.
Yann, @Tire-comedon , is my go-to authority for ads and info from this era.

 
Posts
91
Likes
207
Tonneau case with hinged "securitas" lug is an easy search, here is what AJTT shows.
Yann, @Tire-comedon , is my go-to authority for ads and info from this era.


Thanks for sharing Buck (great flick). I'll try reaching out to Yan and continue searching for the roman numeral model, but at least this confirms the caliber and gives me a better idea of what the logo should look like.. Should help me source an appropriate crown as well!
 
Posts
3,469
Likes
7,970
Erich, @mac_omega, commented earlier that the dial has been refinished, so you may not find a similar dial on this model.
While not original, it certainly has a nice look and if serviced would be a great watch to wear on rare occasion (no water resistance or shock protection).
Pop it open when you get it and let's see the inside.
I love the look of these tonneau's, mine says hi. (old photo from Kyle L.)

 
Posts
91
Likes
207
Erich, @mac_omega, commented earlier that the dial has been refinished, so you may not find a similar dial on this model.
While not original, it certainly has a nice look and if serviced would be a great watch to wear on rare occasion (no water resistance or shock protection).
Pop it open when you get it and let's see the inside.
I love the look of these tonneau's, mine says hi. (old photo from Kyle L.)


I appreciate the supportive words. I generally stay away from redials but I agree, I couldn't resist getting my hands on a tonneau and I think it looks quite alright, all things considered. I actually dug up another example of this model on antiquorum, but not sure if that one's original either - if logo should look more like yours and sub-second crosshair doesn't look quite centered with the 12/6 markers.. plus too clean? The crown looks similar to mine but it's hard to tell from just one photo, maybe both newer replacements. Also claims it to be house a cal. 12 - we'll see when mine arrives.

So you're the owner of that golden beauty .. saw this pop up in my searches recently, it's a fantastic piece! 馃憤

I'll upload more photos hopefully in the next week or so.
Edited:
 
Posts
3,370
Likes
7,214
@purplecat

Please don麓t rely on what you see on randomly found photos. Both sources (Antiquorum and the large photo in the Omega book AJTT) show reprinted dials (I am sure it more likely looked as on the watch visible in the ad). Auction houses often don麓t have the expertise to describe watches accurately or they deliberately ommit crucial aspects like refinished dials in their lot description for obvious reasons 馃槖
Although Omega麓s book often is a great source of knowledge it is still full of misleading photos of restored watches.
My advice to you: better to rely on experienced fellow collectors on OF
@UncleBuck showed a well preserved (although a bit younger and different reference) - the logo and font should look similar
This is the logo as it should look like



It is a bit faded and on a "wave area" but it gives you an idea.
And another one from a socalled "Banana" of about the same era



These early watches often had "guilloched" (structured = engine-turned) surfaces on their dials
Edited:
 
Posts
91
Likes
207
@purplecat

Please don麓t rely on what you see on randomly found photos. Both sources (Antiquorum and the Omega book AJTT) show reprinted dials. Auction houses often don麓t have the expertise to describe watches accurately or they deliberately ommit crucial aspects like refinished dials in their lot description for obvious reasons 馃槖
Although Omega麓s book often is a great source of knowledge it is still full of misleading photos of restored watches.
My advice to you: better to rely on experienced fellow collectors on OF
@UncleBuck showed a well preserved (although a bit younger and different reference) - the logo and font should look similar
This is the logo as it should look like



It is a bit faded and on a "wave area" but it gives you an idea.
And another one from a socalled "Banana" of about the same era



These early watches often had "guilloched" (structured = engine-turned) surfaces on their dials

Your tips and advice are very appreciated - OF has been an immense help in general, not just in this case, though I should have questioned sooner.

I would consider having the logo re-done, if not the whole dial, but I don't know if it's even worth it (especially in the eyes of collectors). I'll try sourcing an original dial here on the forum when the watch arrives. My intention is to keep and enjoy the watch of course. If you know someone from the community who might have a correct dial, please do share so I can reach out.
Edited:
 
Posts
91
Likes
207
@mac_omega @UncleBuck so the watch just arrived today but I don't know how to get to the movement. I see there is a small flathead screw under the bottom left and top right corners of the dial, are these what is holding the movement in place? Is there a specific way to remove it afterwards to keep everything safe? Should I wait until the movement is stopped/unwound?



Also does this crown look like a replacement?

Cheers
Alex
Edited:
 
Posts
3,469
Likes
7,970
Is there a specific way to remove it afterwards to keep everything safe?
Yes! Just use one of these......


Seriously, the screws would be a reasonable assumption but DO NOT take my word for it! Erich, @mac_omega very well may know but sit tight and the more knowledgeable may help.
 
Posts
408
Likes
619
A more than centenarian watch馃憤 Like it although can't tell about authenticity being rocky.
From a candid eye 馃榾... Would like to point out that the one pictured in 2014' sale ad and photo by OP could not be the same watch ... since the OP seems to own a 2 tone dial. Perhaps in the meantime that dial has been "enhanced"?
Pls see photo below
 
Posts
3,370
Likes
7,214
I confirm that these 2 screws have to be removed, then you can take out the movement/dial unit without risk.
And yes, the crown is a replacement
 
Posts
91
Likes
207
A more than centenarian watch馃憤 Like it although can't tell about authenticity being rocky.
From a candid eye 馃榾... Would like to point out that the one pictured in 2014' sale ad and photo by OP could not be the same watch ... since the OP seems to own a 2 tone dial. Perhaps in the meantime that dial has been "enhanced"?
Pls see photo below

I think it's just the angle and how the dial is catching the light that changes the appearance, I'm pretty sure they're the same watch.. I can recreate the same single color effect in the sun. The case itself otherwise feels like a dream in the hand and on the wrist 馃榾

I confirm that these 2 screws have to be removed, then you can take out the movement/dial unit without risk.
And yes, the crown is a replacement

Great, thanks for confirming. Sadly none of my micro-flathead screwdrivers are thin enough to catch the screw so I'll likely visit a local watchmaker tomorrow if I don't find any other tools in the meantime.
 
Posts
91
Likes
207
@mac_omega @UncleBuck I managed to get it open but the movement doesn't seem to match, perhaps a later caliber? Do the case hallmarks even look authentic? 馃槙 Apologies for the unclear case photo
 
Posts
3,370
Likes
7,214
Case markings look OK
the movement looks like a cal. 26.5 which is a bit younger than the usually found cal 13麓麓麓
IMO this watch deserves an EoA - but give them the case serial# only as these early watches are searched by case# in the archive.