it's the ridiculous statement that it is structural damage that people are reacting to. 'Cosmetic' is not the same thing. And real structural damage would not be considered 'minor'. Calling that structural is overly dramatic, and inaccurate.
Won’t be engaging with anyone here. Contact the OP on Watchuseek (link above) if you’d like to depreciate/ridicule his experience.
They’re internal dents… caused by the springbar… upon incorrect removal… that manifest on the outer edge of the lug. Something about that tells me it’s a bit more than your standard external, cosmetic scratch.
Get it?
They’re internal dents… caused by the springbar… upon incorrect removal… that manifest on the outer edge of the lug. Something about that tells me it’s a bit more than your standard external, cosmetic scratch.
Get it?
For example, is there any difference between structural damage on building after earthquake (been there last year) and cosmetic damage on facade?
Next time put masking tape on the lugs before strap change.
Nope! No strap changes here my friend. Dropped the watch onto the corner of my desk LOL!
The thing about chips is you can’t stop at just one.
(Translating chips to crisps for the UK members)
So I’ll be around… chiming in here and there, as I see fit.
The thing about chips is you can’t stop at just one.
(Translating chips to crisps for the UK members)
So I’ll be around… chiming in here and there, as I see fit.
Resistance really is futile 😁
I’ve created somewhat of a stir here by simply showcasing flaws in a watch I bought a few months ago (and the infamous lug damage example above) - but I have to admit, the trolls/immature types here are really sophisticated in their mockery/bullying, and the cross-thread attention span is pretty good!
So I’ll be around… chiming in here and there, as I see fit.
Feel free, we all need a laugh now and again during these testing times.
I think the point your missing is that if it is so infamous why has no one on the largest forum for Omega watch owners ever heard about it?
