Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
It had wrong hands when I got it - now it has wrong hands that I like. I have the sword hands too somewhere ...
Omega did do a version with this hand style.
Check out my post...https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread....mega-Seamaster-300-including-Military-watches pics 18 and 19.
Same as usual
Where did u get this info ?
Is anything confirmed or done together with omega ?
I doubt e.g your bezel order
Why should a later production military have a mk2 bezel with a non serif one which is way older than the watch ?
Also the dauphine hands i doubt in 165024, only cuz it is shown in Italian catalog it isn’t true as we find also an ed white with short subdial indexes and base 1000 bezel in catalog which is nonsense
Also during 14577 they swapped to candle stick hands, so switching back to worse readable hands makes absolutely no sense
For 6 years, Jack’s SM300 research has been a goto spot for SM300 wannabes. For Myself and hundreds of others.
Is it perfect .... no. But it answers many questions and can save many newbies countless mistakes.
Silly to nitpick his fine, FREE, research. Don’t like it @Vintagewtchzilla. Write your own.
Omega did do a version with this hand style.
Check out my post...https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread....mega-Seamaster-300-including-Military-watches pics 18 and 19.
Same as usual
Where did u get this info ?
Is anything confirmed or done together with omega ?
I doubt e.g your bezel order
Why should a later production military have a mk2 bezel with a non serif one which is way older than the watch ?
Also the dauphine hands i doubt in 165024, only cuz it is shown in Italian catalog it isn’t true as we find also an ed white with short subdial indexes and base 1000 bezel in catalog which is nonsense
Also during 14577 they swapped to candle stick hands, so switching back to worse readable hands makes absolutely no sense