cvalue13
·Just as soon as I start trying to learn the about Seamaster 300's, I'm watching the auction site and one pops up for an extremely good price (assuming it's even an 80% watch), with two extremely poor photos.
Well, I leap despite my relative ignorance, and it just arrived today.
Anyone with ultra-knowledge of SM300's add or detract from my observations below?
The 550 movement is very grimey, but still has consistent and bright color (under the grime). It's a 27, xxx,xxx. (It's ticking from the shipping here, but I wish I could stop it!)
The case back purports a 165.024. This seems to square with the movement #'s. (Unfortunately, some oaf with likely a pair of scissors ruined an otherwise great case back.)
The case itself is clean, with an almost suspiciously clean bezel, but that seems to be consistently aged with the dial. Bezel turns fine.
As for the dial, the biggest annoyance is a gap of lume in the largest sword hand. There are also a couple of tiny spots on the black, which appear more oily than the otherwise consistently matte black dial (look between the 10 and 11 lumes, and just south east of the "9").
No clue about the bracelet, though at least the clasp hinge is definitely not Omega.
What to do about the lume gap!?!
Thanks, gents.
Edit: The more I look at it, the more this bezel must be a replacement - ammiright? It appears to be a circa '69 bezel, with rounded '3', flat-top '4' and angled serif on '1'. Also, would it be common for the "swiss made" to be obscured by a silver ring circling the dial?
Well, I leap despite my relative ignorance, and it just arrived today.
Anyone with ultra-knowledge of SM300's add or detract from my observations below?
The 550 movement is very grimey, but still has consistent and bright color (under the grime). It's a 27, xxx,xxx. (It's ticking from the shipping here, but I wish I could stop it!)
The case back purports a 165.024. This seems to square with the movement #'s. (Unfortunately, some oaf with likely a pair of scissors ruined an otherwise great case back.)
The case itself is clean, with an almost suspiciously clean bezel, but that seems to be consistently aged with the dial. Bezel turns fine.
As for the dial, the biggest annoyance is a gap of lume in the largest sword hand. There are also a couple of tiny spots on the black, which appear more oily than the otherwise consistently matte black dial (look between the 10 and 11 lumes, and just south east of the "9").
No clue about the bracelet, though at least the clasp hinge is definitely not Omega.
What to do about the lume gap!?!
Thanks, gents.
Edit: The more I look at it, the more this bezel must be a replacement - ammiright? It appears to be a circa '69 bezel, with rounded '3', flat-top '4' and angled serif on '1'. Also, would it be common for the "swiss made" to be obscured by a silver ring circling the dial?